My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-2013
>
City Council
>
EDA
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
06-10-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2018 6:42:24 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 6:42:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDA
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
Date
6/10/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA April 22, 2013 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />the EDA to discuss advertising the City to a target audience of businesses and potential 1 <br />developers. She commented the EDC discussed this item last Friday but does not have a 2 <br />recommendation at this time. The EDC would like to further review the item at their May 3 <br />meeting prior to making a recommendation to Council. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Commissioner Mueller thanked staff for working through this issue with the EDC and she looked 6 <br />forward to hearing their recommendation in May. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Commissioner Meehlhause noted he attended the EDC meeting last Friday and one item 9 <br />discussed was better utilizing the billboards in the community to create interest for potential 10 <br />developers. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Flaherty explained he looked forward to discussing this item in detail next month. 13 <br /> 14 <br />B. Review Home Improvement Loan Program 15 <br /> 16 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated the EDA’s home improvement loan program 17 <br />was created in late 2010. The four different loan types were discussed in detail. She explained a 18 <br />total of three loans have been closed since the program began. It was noted the lack of interest in 19 <br />this program could be due to the downturn in the economy or rise in unemployment. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz commented the EDC discussed this program and 22 <br />recommended the EDA reduce the amount allotted for the loan program to $100,000. This 23 <br />would allow for the remaining $50,000 to be used for revitalization of County Road 10. The 24 <br />EDC also recommended the EDA increase the home demolition loan amount to $15,000, which 25 <br />would closer reflect the actual expense to demo a home. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Commissioner Mueller questioned how the EDC suggested the $50,000 should be used for 28 <br />revitalization. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated no priorities were specified at 29 <br />their last meeting. She commented the EDC understood that the corridor was a priority and 30 <br />having these funds available would better align with the EDA’s 2013 goals. She indicated 31 <br />$100,000 would be enough to meet the current needs of the home improvement loan program. 32 <br /> 33 <br />President Flaherty thought this adjustment made sense and the shift in funds would assist the 34 <br />EDA in meeting their goals for the corridor. He supported the increase to the home demolition 35 <br />loan amount to $15,000. He explained the economy was coming around and the loan program 36 <br />may see more use in the coming years. 37 <br /> 38 <br />President Flaherty requested staff review the loan documents further to see if performance 39 <br />measures were in place for demolition loans. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Vice President Gunn reviewed the loan process forms noting all contractors had to be licensed 42 <br />and all work must be completed within 120 days of the loan closing. It was her understanding 43 <br />that these stipulations ensured that demolition work would be completed. 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.