My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-26-2012
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
03-26-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:05 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 7:02:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/26/2012
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
3/26/2012
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 8B <br />Meeting Date: March 26, 2012 <br />Type of Business: EDA <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Economic Development Authority <br />From: Heidi Steinmetz, Economic Development Specialist <br />Item Title/Subject: EDC’s County Road 10 Beautification Recommendations <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />At the January 3, 2012 Work Session, the City Council discussed possible County Road 10 <br />enhancements and requested that the EDC provide a list to the EDA of County Road 10 <br />beautification items that could be implemented as early as this summer. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />In order to create the list, the EDC reviewed the following: <br /> <br /> County Road 10 related improvements included in the City’s 2012-2016 Five-Year <br />Financial Plan <br /> 2002 County Road 10 Redevelopment and Redevelopment Plan Preliminary Cost <br />Estimates <br /> EDA’s unobligated Tax Increment Financing (TIF) balances <br /> <br />On March 9, 2012, the EDC ranked several County Road 10 beautification items, which are <br />numbered on the attachment in order of importance for the EDA’s review. There are two <br />items ranked as #1 (trash cleanup and mowing) because the EDC agreed that those two <br />items are equally important. <br /> <br />Regarding the item ranked #2 (plant trees along Right-of-Way), Ramsey County Public <br />Works staff provided City staff with the attached page from MnDOT’s Road Design Manual, <br />which shows that on a 50 mile per hour road, the required obstacle-free clear zone is 40 <br />feet. This is measured from the edge of the driving lane. Since the distance from the edge <br />of one driving lane to the other across the County Road 10 median is typically 50 feet, it’s <br />not possible to avoid the clear zone. Crash testing has determined that a 4” wood structure <br />(a tree, mailbox post, sign post, etc) is the maximum size that does not constitute a <br />hazard. Therefore, planting trees in the County Road 10 median is not practical. If the road <br />were converted to an “urban” section, with curbs, trees would be permitted under MnDOT <br />standards, as long as they were 10’ behind the curb. The cost of rebuilding the road as an <br />urban roadway, however, would be something like $4 million per mile. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.