Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA November 8, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />Program Criteria 45 <br /> 46 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz reviewed with the EDA the proposed changes to 47 <br />the Loan Program Criteria. She indicated the EDA has been discussing this item for several 48 <br />months and the most recent draft has a summary of changes highlighted in yellow. An asset limit 49 <br />was written in to Loan Option 4, which was recommended by the GMHC staff. Staff 50 <br />recommends approval of the draft home improvement loan program criteria. If approved staff 51 <br />would discuss administrative under writing fees with GMHC in further detail and would bring 52 <br />forward an agreement to the EDA. 53 <br /> 54 <br />Commissioner Mueller asked if the demolition loan was for 10 years, or if it was due upon sale 55 <br />of the property. She recommended these statements within the criteria be conjoined so as not to 56 <br />appear there is an option. 57 <br /> 58 <br />Vice President Stigney questioned if the EDA should have greater knowledge of the GMHC fees 59 <br />prior to advertising this loan program. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated 60 <br />she would not begin marketing the program if the EDA advised. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Vice President Stigney asked how loans would be handled if defaulted on by a resident. 63 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated the City could potentially be out the 64 <br />money. 65 <br /> 66 <br />Vice President Stigney questioned what action the City could take and if the City had no options, 67 <br />he had a problem with the criteria in this program. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz 68 <br />indicated the City would be second in line to be paid if a home were to be foreclosed. 69 <br /> 70 <br />President Flaherty asked if the City had the right to put a lien on the property. Community 71 <br />Development Director Roberts stated the loan was a lien. He indicated if the property were to 72 <br />sell, the lien would be paid, but if foreclosed it potentially would be negated. 73 <br /> 74 <br />Commissioner Hull questioned how this type of program worked in other cities. Economic 75 <br />Development Specialist Steinmetz stated all were written in the same manner and these loans 76 <br />were never paid back first, prior to a home mortgage. She explained the City would be at a slight 77 <br />risk with these loans. 78 <br /> 79 <br />Vice President Stigney wondered if a City loan could be tacked on to property taxes if defaulted. 80 <br /> Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz was uncertain if this was an option. 81 <br /> 82 <br />Vice President Stigney requested that GMHC fees be waived if a loan within the City were 83 <br />defaulted. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz indicated she would investigate this 84 <br />further with GMHC. 85 <br /> 86