My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2010
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
11-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:16:29 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 8:27:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2010
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
11/8/2010
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA October 25, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br /> 44 <br />7. EDA BUSINESS 45 <br /> 46 <br />A. Resolution 10-EDA-261 Approving Mounds View Home Improvement Loan 47 <br />Program Criteria 48 <br /> 49 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Steinmetz explained at the September 7th Work Session, the 50 <br />City Council directed staff to develop criteria for a new, one-year pilot program of home 51 <br />improvement loan options. The EDA reviewed draft criteria for the program on September 27th 52 <br />and requested that staff make several changes to the criteria. The EDC reviewed the draft criteria 53 <br />on October 15th and made recommendations for changes to the criteria for the EDA to consider. 54 <br /> 55 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Steinmetz reviewed the changes with the EDA in detail. 56 <br />City staff, the EDC and Suzanne Snyder (GMHC) share the concern that the EDA’s request to set 57 <br />the loan to value ratio at 90% (instead of 110% as originally proposed by City staff) would 58 <br />drastically limit the pool of Mounds View loan applicants. This is because many people who 59 <br />would apply for these loans do not have 10% or more equity in their homes. The other two 60 <br />loans, emergency loan and code enforcement loan, would stay at 100%. Staff further reviewed 61 <br />neighboring communities home improvement loan program information. 62 <br /> 63 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Steinmetz indicated a change may need to be made 64 <br />regarding the third party appraisals for these loans. At times this will be necessary and other 65 <br />times will not. Staff recommended that the EDA approve Resolution 10-EDA-261 approving the 66 <br />Mounds View Home Improvement Loan Program Criteria with the EDC’s recommended 67 <br />changes. After this approval, city staff would begin marketing the program (in November and 68 <br />December of 2010) for a program launch in January 2011. After the EDA finalizes the criteria, 69 <br />Suzanne Snyder and Marie Malrick will discuss underwriting fees with City staff and then City 70 <br />staff would present the information to the EDA at a future meeting. 71 <br /> 72 <br />President Flaherty requested further information on the third party appraisal situation. Economic 73 <br />Development Coordinator Steinmetz noted information could also be gained off of the Ramsey 74 <br />County property tax records or comparable residential real estate records and the City would not 75 <br />have to be an official appraisal. 76 <br /> 77 <br />Commissioner Mueller questioned if Option 1, the demolition deferred loan, had to be 18% per 78 <br />annum. She recommended this rate be reduced to 4% or prime, as 18% would be highly 79 <br />prohibitive. Economic Development Coordinator Steinmetz indicated this information was taken 80 <br />out of another document as a standard and could be changed by the EDA. The demolition loan 81 <br />was due upon title change, when the primary mortgage was paid off, or when the owner no 82 <br />longer ceases to live at the residence. Executive Director Ericson indicated the rate was selected 83 <br />because it would encourage full repayment upon the sale of the property. 84 <br /> 85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.