My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2009
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-11-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:24 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 8:44:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/11/2009
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
9/11/2009
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA April 13, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />back taxes owed. Commissioner Gunn stated a willingness to approve the amendment since the 86 <br />TIF District will continue, she would like the business to stay in Mounds View, and if approved 87 <br />they would be able to pay their current and back taxes. 88 <br /> 89 <br />Commissioner Hull stated support to consider the amendment with no contingencies since it 90 <br />would result in the hotel being sold, The Mermaid would be in a better financial position, 91 <br />expansion of the hotel would occur to increase the value and tax base, and additional jobs may be 92 <br />created. Currently, it would be a burden on The Mermaid if required to pay one-third of the bond 93 <br />note. 94 <br /> 95 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that expanding the tax base will not matter until the TIF District is 96 <br />paid off. He stated support to shorten the life of the TIF District and pointed out that no 97 <br />information has been provided regarding The Mermaid’s financial position so he is not able to 98 <br />consider that matter. He stated he is not in favor of an “all or nothing” position but would like to 99 <br />know what MoundsVista will offer to accomplish the amendment. 100 <br /> 101 <br />Commissioner Mueller noted that one bondholder has indicated no objection to not paying off 102 <br />the bond and the other bondholder has indicated they want to be bought out. Economic 103 <br />Development Specialist Steinmetz explained that when MoundsVista was considering an earlier 104 <br />amendment, Western Bank indicated a willingness to buy out First Bank. However, noting has 105 <br />been submitted in writing to confirm that remains the case. 106 <br /> 107 <br />President Flaherty stated he had hoped The Mermaid owners would be in attendance to answer 108 <br />questions. However, they did relate to staff that they are unable to pay off one-third of the bonds. 109 <br />He noted that The Mermaid is a struggling business, they are making attempts to gain solvency, 110 <br />and that revenue may be needed to pay property taxes. 111 <br /> 112 <br />President Flaherty asked whether Mounds View assumes any risk by modifying the Agreement. 113 <br />Executive Director Ericson stated it would not. 114 <br /> 115 <br />President Flaherty asked what is the benefit to retire a portion of the District. Executive Director 116 <br />Ericson explained the EDA can selectively decertify parcels but could not decertify any Mermaid 117 <br />parcels while a TIF note is associated with those parcels. The drawback is that the TIF dollars 118 <br />otherwise generated on those parcels would no longer be available for street and utility projects 119 <br />and the City’s budget anticipates those dollars will be available. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Vice President Stigney stated again he would like to know what MoundsVista is willing to do if 122 <br />the EDA considers the requested amendment. He noted when the hotel expansion occurs, they 123 <br />may request it to also be in the TIF District. 124 <br /> 125 <br />President Flaherty commented on the importance of balancing the needs of the City with the 126 <br />needs of the property owner. He stated he would take that stance for any Mounds View business, 127
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.