Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA May 11, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> 171 <br />President Flaherty stated a Program is in place and each request can be considered on its own 172 <br />merit. He suggested the current building owner could request funding through the program to 173 <br />install the floor so it meets the Program criteria. President Flaherty stated it may be time to 174 <br />relook at the Program and asked staff to see if something can be worked out with the current 175 <br />building owner. 176 <br /> 177 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated Silverview Chiropractic has been in Mounds 178 <br />View for about 19 years. 179 <br /> 180 <br />Executive Director Ericson noted if the application is from Silverview Chiropractic instead of the 181 <br />new dental business, the end result remains the same and he questioned whether Silverview 182 <br />Chiropractic would want to be obligated for another $50,000 when they want to sell the space. 183 <br /> 184 <br />Vice President Stigney stated he does not support using City money to help this business and 185 <br />suggested staff look at job grants and other funding opportunities. 186 <br /> 187 <br />Majority EDA consensus was reached that it would be willing to look at the application. 188 <br /> 189 <br /> C. Update – Property Owner (2949 Highway 10) Acquisition Request. 190 <br /> 191 <br />Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz reviewed the request of Mark Schnor to purchase 192 <br />his .26-acre property at 2949 Highway 10 for redevelopment purposes. She advised that a 193 <br />developer is interested in constructing rental townhomes on that property and four adjacent 194 <br />properties. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz asked whether the EDA would support 195 <br />townhomes on these five properties. 196 <br /> 197 <br />Community Development Roberts stated the parcels would require rezoning if used as 198 <br />townhomes. If the EDA is not interested in townhomes, staff would inform the developer of that 199 <br />stance. 200 <br /> 201 <br />The EDA discussed the potential townhome development. Vice President Stigney stated 202 <br />residents felt that Mounds View had enough rental property so he does not support the proposal. 203 <br />Commissioner Gun agreed the purpose of rezoning was to keep housing off Highway 10. 204 <br />President Flaherty felt the City wanted more of a B2 or B3 use along Highway 10 rather than 205 <br />housing. 206 <br /> 207 <br />Executive Director Ericson added that the intent was not to completely redevelop to a business 208 <br />corridor, but that there would be some housing. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the corridor 209 <br />as mixed use with a housing component. He noted there may be residential opposition to a 210 <br />commercial development on this site and there has been a transition with a higher number of the 211 <br />population choosing to rent rather than buy. 212