Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA September 28, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />current wall color. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz informed the EDA of the input 86 <br />from the City’s cable operator who said that the gold color would stand out sufficiently on 87 <br />camera. 88 <br /> 89 <br />Commissioner Mueller stated support for the Spectrum Sign Systems proposal for a 7.5-foot sign 90 <br />in a dark burnished gold color. Commissioner Gunn concurred. 91 <br /> 92 <br />President Flaherty noted the Other Professional Services budget is a TIF generated fund. 93 <br />Executive Director Ericson indicated that is correct and use of this fund is specified. He 94 <br />explained that the City’s recent branding project qualifies for use of these funds as well as 95 <br />marketing and TIF District improvements. President Flaherty stated if these funds could be used 96 <br />to write down the general fund balance or to balance the levy, he would have an issue with this 97 <br />consideration. Executive Director Ericson said that TIF dollars can only be spent only for 98 <br />specific uses. President Flaherty stated his support for the Spectrum Sign Systems proposal in a 99 <br />gold color. 100 <br /> 101 <br />Vice President Stigney pointed out that TIF funds can be used for trails and roads and since a 102 <br />road reconstruction project is being done, indirectly, money saved here can be used there, 103 <br />resulting in lower taxes to residents. Vice President Stigney asked why quotes were obtained at 104 <br />this time. Economic Development Specialist Steinmetz stated in May, the EDA directed staff to 105 <br />start implementing the City’s new logo. Staff started implementing the logo where it would not 106 <br />cost anything and then staff began obtaining quotes for the most visible signs in the City. She 107 <br />believes it would be a good thing to implement the new logo based on the Council’s decision to 108 <br />adopt a new logo back in April. Vice President Stigney noted the April decision by the Council 109 <br />was to implement the logo where there was no cost; however, this consideration would cost 110 <br />money to implement. 111 <br /> 112 <br />President Flaherty stated his impression the Council had given direction for staff to start 113 <br />implementing the logo and, eventually, this matter would have to be considered. 114 <br /> 115 <br />Commissioner Hull asked what happens to this $1,400 if it is not spent on the wall sign. 116 <br />Executive Director Ericson stated the funds would remain in this budget. 117 <br /> 118 <br />President Flaherty stated his support of the branding process and marketing Mounds View but he 119 <br />did have an issue with spending tax dollars at this time due to the economy. He stated if this 120 <br />fund balance is forwarded to 2010 with no additional money budgeted for this fund, it would be 121 <br />more palatable to consider spending funds on the wall sign. Executive Director Ericson 122 <br />explained at the end of the year, a transfer will be made from TIF Districts to cover expenditures 123 <br />(as needed). So, deferring a purchase to 2010 would not change anything since it is a “paper” 124 <br />budget. 125 <br /> 126 <br />Vice President Stigney stated if approved, he thinks “City of” should be included in the sign, it 127