My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-2008
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
05-12-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:25 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 9:31:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/12/2008
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
5/12/2008
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 7A, Discuss Marketing Preferences for EDA-Owned Property <br />May 12, 2008 EDA Meeting <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />Additional Marketing: Signage and Land Price Clarification <br /> <br />Signage <br /> <br />Another idea for promoting the site would be a “Land for Development” sign to be <br />placed on the property for public relations purposes. Since the property is not <br />generating additional tax base for the City, a sign would send the message to residents <br />and the larger community that the EDA is being proactive with trying to sell or initiate a <br />project on the property. Inquiries from developers and commercial real estate brokers <br />are typically generated from the MN Commercial Association of Realtors (MNCAR) <br />Website or by word-of-mouth, so as mentioned above, the main purpose of a “Land for <br />Development” sign would be for public relations purposes. <br /> <br />Since the agreement with Master Development will soon expire and in an effort to be <br />proactive, staff requested basic real estate sign quotes from three sign companies, <br />located in Blaine, Fridley and Mounds View. Staff received two quotes and Let’s Get <br />Graphic in Mounds View was the only company to submit a proof, which is attached for <br />the EDA’s review. Staff will verbally present the details of the sign quotes at the EDA <br />meeting if the EDA wishes to move forward with a sign. <br /> <br />Land Price <br /> <br />A more aggressive marketing approach, which is basically shifting into the “sales” <br />category, may be for the EDA to determine a base land price for the property. The EDA <br />may wish to begin this discussion because it will present a professional image to the <br />development community. If the EDA states that the price is simply “negotiable” without <br />having a base price in mind, this does not send a very professional image to the <br />development community. <br /> <br />The current value of the EDA’s property will be determined by its current use, which is a <br />vacant commercial lot. The value will not be determined by the type of development <br />that may occur on the property in the future. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the EDA <br />will be “made whole” on their acquisition investment of $625,000. <br /> <br />If the EDA wishes to begin discussing a base price at this time, the EDA could <br />determine the price based on sale prices of comparable properties, which is how most <br />offers are generated per a potential buyer’s real estate broker’s guidance. Attached are <br />a few comparable list prices of properties located in nearby communities. <br /> <br />The EDA could also determine the price based on the Ramsey County’s 2008 estimated <br />market value, which is $446,000, which equates to just under $8.00 per square foot. It <br />is highly unlikely that the EDA will receive an offer based on the assessed value but it is <br />a starting point for the EDA to consider.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.