My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
02-14-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:14:49 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 12:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
2/14/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA January 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that a good chunk of his dollars are from 88 <br />the insurance side of things, and that he deals with a variety of worlds in terms of that. He stated 89 <br />that this is a bit different than the Planning Commission in that those members need to be a 90 <br />Mounds View resident. He stated that a lot of people that run businesses in Mounds View don’t 91 <br />live in Mounds View. 92 <br /> 93 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that most businesses in Mounds View are trying to make a profit, 94 <br />so they would be more interested in business development. He stated that Mr. Jaker’s 95 <br />willingness to serve is wonderful. He stated that if Coordinator Backman felt that Mr. Jaker 96 <br />would be a good fit for this position, then he didn’t have a problem with it. 97 <br /> 98 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that he had full confidence in Mr. Jaker. 99 <br /> 100 <br />President Marty stated that he was impressed by Mr. Jaker’s application, resume, and 101 <br />background. 102 <br /> 103 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 104 <br /> 105 <br />6. EDA BUSINESS 106 <br /> 107 <br />A. Resolution 05-EDA-202 Authorizing Payment of Pay-As-You-Go Developer 108 <br />Payments to Red Cent Management, L.L.C; Heartland-Mounds View 109 <br />Common Bond; Bridges Leasing Company; and Kenmark Partnership, 110 <br />L.L.C. 111 <br /> 112 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that twice per year there are payments that 113 <br />go to various projects, and these are developer payments for TIF projects. He stated that they are 114 <br />typically paid the 1st of February and the 1st of August annually. He stated that two of these 115 <br />payments are the final payments, so they will be down to two projects after this payment. 116 <br /> 117 <br />Vice President Stigney noted that for Sep Manufacturing, it’s listed as $8,123.39, yet in the Just 118 <br />and Correct Claims on page 21 he sees Kenmark at $3,886.24, and he asked why there was that 119 <br />discrepancy. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that that was part principle and part interest, and that the interest 122 <br />is on the next page. 123 <br /> 124 <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked how much longer it would be on Heartland-Mounds View and the 125 <br />Century Bank. 126 <br /> 127 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that in terms of Silver Lake Point, that goes 128 <br />until the year 2012. He stated that in terms of Bridges Leasing, that would go until February of 129
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.