My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
05-09-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:15:23 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 12:39:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
5/9/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />must be kept in a reserve account until paid. She provided the Commission with an overview of 213 <br />the operating revenue and expenses noting that they are under budget by approximately 214 <br />$3500.00. She stated that one item not accounted for or considered is the major capital 215 <br />improvements that would be needed over time. She explained that City Council would have to 216 <br />make decisions on the financing for these improvements as they come up in the future. She 217 <br />stated that at the end of the term, 2033, it shows a projected $6.4 million would be retained in 218 <br />earnings. She stated that while weighing the pros and cons of the future they have discussed 219 <br />what would happen to the property when it goes from an exempt status to a taxable status noting 220 <br />that the County Assessor would be required to obtain a current market value of the property. She 221 <br />stated that the base value breakdown, tax generated back to city, shows a base property value 222 <br />$7.2 million. She explained that this value comes from Ramsey County records and provided the 223 <br />Commission with an overview of the total base tax generated and the breakdown to the City 224 <br />General Fund, School Funds and Other Tax Jurisdictions. 225 <br /> 226 <br />President Marty opened the public hearing at 6:42 p.m. 227 <br /> 228 <br />President Marty stated that the Commission would try to answer questions tonight, if not, 229 <br />answers would be provided at the next meeting. 230 <br /> 231 <br />Jerry Linke stated that for someone to say that he is anti-business and anti-development is far 232 <br />from wrong. He commended City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich for the good job on his 233 <br />clarifications and asked for a copy of his report. He acknowledged that the City has a very tough 234 <br />decision to make noting that currently they have nothing to go on to make that decision. He 235 <br />urged the Commission to review other Communities to see how they have addressed these 236 <br />concerns. He stated that the City of Fridley did an Economic Feasibility Study to determine the 237 <br />benefits of having Medtronic in their area and found there were no benefits for the Community. 238 <br />He asked why they are placing TIF on a company that has more money in their slush fund than 239 <br />the City does for it’s own operating expenses. He noted that the current TIF districts are all for a 240 <br />fifteen year timeframe because most buildings would require remodeling at the end of a fifteen 241 <br />year period. He referenced the billboards and proposals and asked if there is a way that the 242 <br />Community could find out the proposed numbers being discussed. He referenced the statement 243 <br />that Blaine would not give Medtronic TIF for Phases 2 and 3 and asked if the $167,000 is what is 244 <br />generated for a year in taxes or does this occur later. 245 <br /> 246 <br />City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich explained that the numbers are based on the base value of the 247 <br />land being frozen from tax exempt to taxable property. He stated that it would net the City 248 <br />approximately $167,000. 249 <br /> 250 <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, thanked the Commission and Ehlers Associates for the 251 <br />opening presentation. She stated that she appreciates hearing the facts and figures noting that she 252 <br />is currently neutral on the issue. She stated that she is waiting to get all the facts before making a 253 <br />full statement about the project and acknowledged receiving emails from Sherry and Roger. She 254
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.