Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA June 27, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br />had issues throughout the discussion process with the timeframe of the TIF District. He stated 592 <br />that it was originally proposed as a redevelopment TIF district, which could have a lifespan of 593 <br />25-years noting that it was changed and modified to what it should be, which is an Economic 594 <br />Development District. He explained that by TIF Statute and State law an Economic 595 <br />Development District is capped at 8-years noting that there was special legislation to extend this 596 <br />to 25-years for Medtronic, and for Medtronic alone. He noted that the first year wouldn’t count 597 <br />so it would actually end up being a 26-year TIF district. He acknowledged that this could pay-off 598 <br />sooner than it is proposed but it is still a quarter of a century and many would not realize the 599 <br />benefits from a 25-year TIF district. He stated that it was pointed out that in actuality the savings 600 <br />would be a couple bucks a year on their taxes through the school districts. He referenced the 601 <br />traffic issues noting that they would have the resources to address these issues in addition to the 602 <br />road repairs. He stated that he does not see this as a big cash cow noting that he discussed this 603 <br />with Finance Director Hansen and asked for his input on the issues. He explained that the 604 <br />Finance Director explained that in 25-years the city would be in great shape but in the meantime, 605 <br />as Joe pointed out, and over the last number years the city has had to do double-digit tax 606 <br />increases just to meet basic city expenses. He stated that at a break of $41,000 to $43,000 a year 607 <br />coming directly to the city would increase a bit every year but the billboard contract was 608 <br />negotiated for five years noting that no one on the Council was actually in favor of billboards. 609 <br />He stated that they worked out a sunset clause where the billboards would come down in twenty 610 <br />years but with this proposal the billboards would not come down for 30-years or longer. He 611 <br />explained that the timeframe doesn’t start until the billboards are moved and in place. He stated 612 <br />that presently all of the billboards are located north of Highway 10 and Medtronic does not want 613 <br />the billboards located on their property. He agreed adding that they cannot fit all of the 614 <br />billboards in this area and some of the billboards would have to be brought into town and remain 615 <br />for the next 30-years. He clarified that he has never been in favor of billboards but agreed to the 616 <br />contract as a means to an end to pay off the golf course without incurring an increase in property 617 <br />taxes to pay off the golf course. He stated that he would like to move to table this discussion to 618 <br />ask Springsted and Associates to review this proposal and give the City an independent third-619 <br />party viewpoint. 620 <br /> 621 <br />Vice President Stigney called a point of order stating that a motion to table is out of order in 622 <br />accordance with the Roberts Rules. 623 <br /> 624 <br />President Marty moved to postpone. 625 <br /> 626 <br />Vice President Stigney referred to page 201 of Roberts Rules of Order, newly revised, it states 627 <br />that tabling a motion can only be used to set something aside temporarily for a matter that is of 628 <br />more urgency that needs to be dealt with at that moment. 629 <br /> 630 <br />City Attorney Riggs clarified that it should be a motion to postpone. 631 <br />MOTION/SECOND Marty/ To postpone further discussion and to ask Springsted and 632 <br />Associates to review this proposal and give the City an independent third-party viewpoint. 633