Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA June 27, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> 256 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that he would like to discuss this evening 257 <br />whether this is the right. He stated that he is here to ask the Commission to deny this resolution 258 <br />and the multiple parts of the resolution. He stated that things should be taken in their piece parts 259 <br />and in order. He stated that he does not understand how the EDA has the authority to do 260 <br />something, which the City has the unique authority to do. He asked if it is right that the Council 261 <br />and the EDA had conversations for six months out of the sight and earshot of the public so that 262 <br />the public conversation was delayed because it was unknown what the conversations were. He 263 <br />asked if it is right that Council and EDA have only had analysis about one project with the City 264 <br />income with the level of detail presented to the public and has not pursued the same level of 265 <br />detail for the other options. He asked if it is right to use private negotiations for public property 266 <br />when a public auction with full disclosure and open bidding allows the public to see the total 267 <br />results and the real interests of any other parties, plus it doesn’t create a veil over what is 268 <br />occurring. He clarified his understanding that Minnesota’s Open Meeting Law is intended to 269 <br />ensure full public disclosure and participation in matters that seriously affect the city and 270 <br />questioned whether this meeting law has been skirted. He suggested that a public auction would 271 <br />remove the sense of conspiracy or private deals and it would allow the public into the discourse. 272 <br />He asked if it is right to allow an issue this large to be decided by five duly elected officials when 273 <br />there are so many strong and diverse opinions noting that elections have been used in the past to 274 <br />make decisions that did not have as large of an impact on the city. He referenced the finances 275 <br />and asked if it is right to use TIF for redevelopment, a tool originally intended for developing 276 <br />housing and businesses that need assistance to grow jobs and to replace structurally unsafe 277 <br />buildings or abandoned buildings or unused tank facilities. He asked if it right to use this tool in 278 <br />order to give a tax business because it is a large State employer. He asked if it is right to give 279 <br />TIF, according to an email received from Senator Betzold, that states that it seemed right for the 280 <br />City of New Brighton so it seemed right for the City of Mounds View. He asked if it is right to 281 <br />allow an employer to change the rules by going to the legislature, their local Senator and 282 <br />Representative, to offer modifying language to include a one time public golf course, which they 283 <br />desire to change. He asked if negotiation with only one party pass the fiduciary responsibility 284 <br />test and is it right to put big business desires ahead of individual citizen property rights. Is it 285 <br />right to take citizen property and give it to business and have no appreciable benefit to the 286 <br />citizens for over a quarter of a century. He asked if it is right to sell a major asset of the city and 287 <br />only get a $43,000 in property tax with a projected $80,000 cost to the city for services. He 288 <br />asked if it is right to change the quality of life issues for citizens when there is no benefit to the 289 <br />city except for a dollar off the city taxes. He asked if it is right to undertake more turmoil in 290 <br />moving the Clear Channel boards when that issue was finally settled. He stated that on the issue 291 <br />of right or wrong, leadership is about seeing right and wrong, and even if all the pressure from 292 <br />business, significant business people and business citizens, and political leaders, is to lean 293 <br />towards the wrong decision because others do it all the time and that is what’s done. He stated 294 <br />that a leader sees what’s right and what’s wrong and makes the right choice to protect the citizens 295 <br />and the right decision to not give in to pressures from companies that have the financial means 296 <br />but won’t commit to do what is right and not take advantage of anyone. He stated that 297