Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />noted that typically the City has had terms longer than three years noting that the consensus was 171 <br />to have the assistance within a defined, shorter period of time. He stated that Scott McGuire, 172 <br />CFO, also indicated that this would be a sufficient time period for them. 173 <br /> 174 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that it was his understanding that SYSCO indicated that cash flow 175 <br />was not a problem for them and they didn’t care if they got it upfront or stretched out. He stated 176 <br />that if the City received a one-year TIF then the TIF would be ready to close out when the TIF 177 <br />District is ready to close out. He stated that to him this appears as if they are extending the TIF 178 <br />District to accommodate SYSCO and he has a problem with that. 179 <br /> 180 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that the City is looking at various aspects 181 <br />in terms of cash flow noting that the City would still have the ability to decertify the district five 182 <br />years early noting that it would not preclude a lot of options for the City. 183 <br /> 184 <br />Vice President Stigney asked how the City could decertify a district if they are still collecting 185 <br />revenues on it over a three-year period. He asked why the City wouldn’t want them to pay it 186 <br />back within the one-year and close the district. 187 <br /> 188 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that the City has various projects currently 189 <br />in the works and have ideas on how the City would improve the Highway 10 corridor noting that 190 <br />it would be a bit premature to presume how much the City would spend on these efforts right 191 <br />now. He stated that hopefully in the next year or two Staff would have a better sense of what 192 <br />those improvements would costs. 193 <br /> 194 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that when a district has met its purpose it is his personal belief that 195 <br />this is when the district should be closed out because it costs the taxpayers money to keep the 196 <br />districts going. 197 <br /> 198 <br />President Marty explained that right now with the TIF Districts the City captures 100-percent of 199 <br />the taxes coming in. He noted that the consultants have pointed out for years that to redesign and 200 <br />redo County Highway 10 would cost far more. He stated that even if the City didn’t spend a 201 <br />dime of the TIF pool up to the time the districts would be re-certified the City would still not 202 <br />have enough money to redo County Highway 10. He stated that they could go ahead and tax the 203 <br />citizens to redo Highway 10 and install a couple of trails. He stated that adding trails, 204 <br />landscaping, repairing some of the intersections and making County Highway 10 safer and more 205 <br />pedestrian friendly would take a lot more money than what the City has. He explained that this is 206 <br />one of the main purposes the City has been earmarking TIF dollars for. He stated that they could 207 <br />also use TIF for housing and redevelopment costs too noting that if they de-certify the district 208 <br />early the City would not have the funds available without taxing for them. 209 <br /> 210 <br />Vice President Stigney clarified that President Marty’s philosophy is that the City should milk 211 <br />every dollar the City can legally get from the TIF district. He stated that he has a problem with 212