Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br /> <br />advised that the City has taken steps to shift liability and there is also insurance to cover certain 750 <br />percentages. He offered to review the contract terms with Mr. McCarty and the EDA, if desired. 751 <br /> 752 <br />Mr. McCarty stated the proposed draft contract does not go into those details, which is part of the 753 <br />dissatisfaction of many residents in Mounds View. He suggested the contract lays the entire 754 <br />indemnification requirements entirely on the City. Mr. McCarty read a portion of the 755 <br />indemnification language and stated to him, that is a very strong commitment. He stated that it is 756 <br />fine to say “only to the extent of $200,000,” but he would like to see evidence where this body 757 <br />can predispose a court order of over $200,000. He stated that it is a commonsense point of view 758 <br />that until the project is finished for the two years or whatever it is, he doubts that a strong case on 759 <br />behalf of an injured party would allow a limit of $200,000 unless Medtronic will pick up the 760 <br />amount over $200,000. 761 <br /> 762 <br />SECOND AMENDMENT MOTION: President Marty/. To amend the third WHEREAS to 763 <br />indicate: “…The EDA has also requested the City Planning Commission to review the plans and 764 <br />did not approve a resolution accordingly, and that the Council schedule a public hearing on the 765 <br />plans upon published notice as required by law. 766 <br /> 767 <br />Amendment motion died due to lack of a second. 768 <br /> 769 <br />Vote on motion as amended: 770 <br /> 771 <br /> Ayes –4 Nay – 1 (Marty) Motion carried. 772 <br /> 773 <br />B. Consideration of EDA Resolution 05-EDA-209, a Resolution Authorizing 774 <br />Payment of Pay-As-You-Go Developer Payment to Red Cent Management, 775 <br />LLC for the Building N Project in Mounds View. 776 <br /> 777 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Bachman referenced the packet provided to the 778 <br />Commission and stated he does this report every six months for the Finance Director. He noted 779 <br />two payments were approved for the first part of August to the Silver Lake Point and Midwest 780 <br />Ivy projects. He stated that basically there were additional property taxes paid by Bethlehem 781 <br />Baptist Church. He stated there was acquisition of Building N by the EDC at the end of June 782 <br />2004. They made a payment at the end of the year and applied for property tax exemption that 783 <br />would be effective for 2005. Ramsey County looked at the transactions and determined there 784 <br />was additional lease revenue paid to the new property owner, Bethlehem Baptist Church, by 785 <br />Medtronic Systems and that went on for a number of months. As a result, Ramsey County 786 <br />determined a portion of the building was taxable so payment of $26,667 was made to Ramsey 787 <br />County in May of 2005. 788 <br /> 789 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Bachman advised that there was a larger payment last time 790 <br />but that was for the full building. The way the TIF agreement is structured, there is an excluded 791