My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-04-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
11-04-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:16:28 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 1:26:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/4/2005
Commission Doc Number ‎(Ord & Res)‎
0
Supplemental fields
Date
11/4/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />7. EDA BUSINESS 44 <br /> 45 <br />A. Presentation by Wanda Hart, Coldwell Banker, re: Laport Meadow 46 <br />Residential Project 47 <br /> 48 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman reviewed that Skyline Builders, Inc. has been 49 <br />considering a potential residential project in the Laport Meadows area. At the September 12, 50 <br />2005 Mounds View EDA meeting, Cheryl Stinski of Skyline Builders and Wander Hart of 51 <br />Coldwell Banker discussed a proposed residential project in the Laport Meadows area, east of 52 <br />Long Lake Road. At that meeting, Jeff Sweitzer, architect with Sharratt Design Company, 53 <br />presented several concept plans of what the project could look like. The EDA asked the 54 <br />developer to revise the concept plans to reduce density and have further discussion with the land 55 <br />owners. 56 <br /> 57 <br />Wanda Hart, Coldwell Banker Burnet, reported that they contacted the 11 parties involved in this 58 <br />potential project, some are landowners and homeowners, some are just homeowners, and some 59 <br />just landowners. Of the 11 contacted, one is a definite ‘no’ to the entire project and the others are 60 <br />in line with the project and thinking about it. She stated the exciting part is that their new idea 61 <br />for the area puts less pressure on Long Lake Road so those homeowners can participate or not. 62 <br /> 63 <br />Jeff Sweitzer, Sharratt Design Company, thanked the EDA for allowing them to present their 64 <br />new proposal tonight. He displayed a concept plan which is predicated on the idea there are 65 <br />certain property owners who are yes, some are no, and some are maybe. He used a map to point 66 <br />out the properties that do not want to participate and noted this plan allows people to be in or out 67 <br />of the project, or added at a later date. It also responds to the Rice Creek Watershed District 68 <br />indication there is a high water table on the western edge. He noted the location of a green 69 <br />backyard buffer to address that issue, resulting in a meandering pathway between two round-70 <br />abouts which will slow down traffic and designate it possibly as its own neighborhood. 71 <br /> 72 <br />Mr. Sweitzer noted this concept is predicated on the compost site moving and a senior housing 73 <br />project located to the north. In addition, they have reduced the number of units so it is not 74 <br />invasive on the wetland or neighborhood. He pointed out the location of the Lund property, 75 <br />which may want to be part of the overall development if it comes to pass. 76 <br /> 77 <br />Mr. Sweitzer placed an overlay on the concept plan which depicted the location of the existing 78 <br />homes. He noted the trail meanders through an evergreen trail, connecting the senior area to the 79 <br />picnic area. The first plan had a pedestrian path out to a fishing pier, which is now more of an 80 <br />internal amenity even though it would be open to all. He emphasized that this new concept is 81 <br />more respectful of the current land owners and their decision to participate or not. 82 <br /> 83 <br />Commissioner Thomas pointed out that it would require them to subdivide and sell part of their 84 <br />property. Mr. Sweitzer stated that is correct and they have addressed that issue with the property 85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.