Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />acre of the 9-acre site. He noted there are issues with the links and pointed out that if the 169 <br />compost site moves to the north, it becomes more visible so buffering would have to be 170 <br />addressed, or they may need to forego one of the buildings. 171 <br /> 172 <br />Mr. Sweitzer pointed out the location of a wetland area to the north, which may be an issue in 173 <br />placing a compost site to the north because it may impact the water quality. He explained that he 174 <br />does not have that expertise so a consultant would have to become involved to determine the 175 <br />impacts to the wetland. 176 <br /> 177 <br />Ms. Hart stated she has walked the site and the area on the north end is very narrow. She felt a 178 <br />compost site would have to come farther down and would end up impacting the location they 179 <br />propose for the northern senior condo building. She stated it is her personal opinion that would 180 <br />not be a good location because it is not large enough and would impact the wetland. 181 <br /> 182 <br />Commissioner Flaherty stated the developer would be hard pressed to get approval from the EDA 183 <br />without some compromise on the compost site by the developers. He stated the compost site 184 <br />needs to be retained in some way and in some location within Mounds View. 185 <br /> 186 <br />Mr. Sweitzer advised that all senior condo parking would be located in a heated underground lot. 187 <br />Surface parking would be created for visitors. 188 <br /> 189 <br />B. Resolution 05-EDA-210 Authorizing the Laport Meadow Wetland 190 <br />Delineation Study 191 <br /> 192 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman used a map to identify the subject area bounded 193 <br />by Highway 10, Long Lake Road, and what would be Laport Drive. He noted the mixed 194 <br />ownership pattern and explained the City owns or controls portions of the area and private 195 <br />landowners the rest. He advised that over eight of the parcels in the Laport Meadows area are 196 <br />currently vacant. 197 <br /> 198 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman advised that staff requested written proposals and 199 <br />received two from qualified firms specializing in wetland sciences to conduct a wetland 200 <br />delineation study of the Laport Meadows area. The proposals ranged in cost from $2,323 to 201 <br />$2,660 with SEH submitting the lowest bid. 202 <br /> 203 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated staff recommends the HRA adopt the draft 204 <br />resolution, which authorizes the consulting firm of SEH, Inc. to conduct a wetland delineation 205 <br />study of the Laport Meadows area at a cost not to exceed $2,500. 206 <br /> 207 <br />President Marty arrived at 7:02 p.m. 208 <br /> 209 <br />Commissioner Flaherty stated per the previous discussion related to the compost site, he would 210