Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View EDA July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />President Marty stated that he is comfortable with this as a pay as you go for $250,000. He 296 <br />agreed that they do need to sort this out and would also look forward to meeting with the EDC 297 <br />and Staff to review some of the priorities, what direction they are going and the goals of the City. 298 <br /> He noted that SYSCO is operating under a timeframe and he does see this as a valid request. 299 <br /> 300 <br />Commissioner Gunn asked for clarification of the de-certification in 2008. 301 <br /> 302 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman explained that if there were an approval in 2005 303 <br />the City would have 2006, 2007 and 2008 as potential years for incremental payments as 304 <br />developer payments back to SYSCO. He further explained that there could be action taken at the 305 <br />end of 2008, effective in 2009 to end the district noting that it would end the district five years 306 <br />early. 307 <br /> 308 <br />Vice President Stigney asked if it would mean $82,500 for next the next three years or would it 309 <br />be divided over four years. He stated that he is not comfortable with the $250,000.00 amount. 310 <br /> 311 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman stated that this could be a decision made by this 312 <br />body. 313 <br /> 314 <br />President Marty clarified that he is hearing that the August 8th date should be kept for the public 315 <br />hearing. 316 <br /> 317 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman asked if they were considering the three-year 318 <br />timeframe. 319 <br /> 320 <br />President Marty stated that the timeframe could be discussed at the hearing. 321 <br /> 322 <br />Director Ericson stated that they could invite the EDC to the September meeting to discuss this 323 <br />issue. 324 <br /> 325 <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, clarified that the EDA is planning to have the public 326 <br />hearing for August 8, 2005 and asked what the purpose of the public hearing would be if there 327 <br />has been no public input. She agreed that the EDC meeting and workshop is long overdue noting 328 <br />that they are mentioning $125,000 versus $250,000. She stated that she likes SYSCO too and 329 <br />clarified that she is not trying to say anything against the pay as you go option noting that at least 330 <br />it is not being taken from the $1 million. She expressed concerns stating that they don’t have a 331 <br />referendum yet to know how it would be paid and referenced the issues with Medtronic. She 332 <br />referenced the Rice Creek Watershed stating that she does not have this included on the agenda 333 <br />for Wednesday night and there are things that they should review. She stated that they prefer to 334 <br />mitigate on site noting that there are things that they haven’t had input on and if the EDA is 335 <br />planning to do a public hearing usually they would wait for the information that would help them 336 <br />in making a decision. 337