My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2005
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
12-12-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:16:40 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 1:28:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/12/2005
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
12/12/2005
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />the EDA has the option to look at de-certification or consider a continuance. He stated that if 212 <br />they continue the TIF District 3 there should be projects that are looked at within that district. He 213 <br />stated that they could not hoard the dollars and they cannot have dollars coming in and not spend 214 <br />it for the purpose it was intended, which is economic development. He explained that in terms of 215 <br />this particular district it is a healthy district noting that they get well over $300,000 a year in 216 <br />increment payments. He stated that it is primarily derived by SYSCO, some derived by ZEPP 217 <br />and some derived by Bridges Leasing, but the majority is derived by SYSCO. He stated that they 218 <br />have had some discussions with Ehlers about doing a complete analysis of all of the districts but 219 <br />the initial review is that they are fairly close to the original figure of approximately $1 million. 220 <br /> 221 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that he would like to see it in black and white as to where the City 222 <br />is at and what the priorities are for the expenditures of the funds as to whether it would be put 223 <br />back and paying the down the tax base or keep the Districts going. He stated that there is a need 224 <br />for further discussion noting that they now have SYSCO asking for money and eventually 225 <br />Snyder’s would be coming in to ask for the same thing. He expressed concerns about the 226 <br />amounts being spent. He stated that he wants the details and the big picture of the project. He 227 <br />stated that he has problems with the amounts and has problems with mitigating offsite. He 228 <br />expressed concerns about the removal of the trees to make way for the parking lot adding that he 229 <br />would like to see a joint meeting with Council and Staff to determine the philosophy and 230 <br />direction on TIF for all of the districts. 231 <br /> 232 <br />President Marty agreed with Vice President Stigney. 233 <br /> 234 <br />Director Ericson agreed stating that this is what Staff is planning to do noting that if they can get 235 <br />the information prepared and presented from Ehlers for the September work session. He stated 236 <br />that this would be the perfect opportunity to discuss the philosophy, the health of the TIF 237 <br />districts, whether the City would de-certify or are they going to fund other projects and at what 238 <br />level. He stated that these are all issues that should be discussed with the EDA, the City Council 239 <br />and Staff. He stated that this should be on the September or October work session agenda. He 240 <br />stated that Staff would have a plan for the future but also need to know where they are today. He 241 <br />stated that in terms of cash on hand, Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated 242 <br />that the City would have approximately $1 million in the TIF account this year adding that what 243 <br />is being proposed would not be out of the TIF pool, but rather an ongoing obligation similar to 244 <br />the original SYSCO agreement, which is a pay as you go note. He stated that it would not impact 245 <br />the account as to what is on hand adding that Staff recognizes and appreciates the comments 246 <br />from the EDA. 247 <br /> 248 <br />Vice President Stigney stated that it would impact the taxpayers noting that the City either 249 <br />extends the district and pay as you go or close the district. He stated that he has concerns noting 250 <br />that the public hearing is scheduled for August 8, 2005 and he would like the information prior to 251 <br />the public hearing. He suggested rescheduling the public hearing in order to give them the 252 <br />opportunity to review all of the information. He stated that this is bigger than just looking at this 253
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.