My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-07-2004 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
06-07-2004 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:23 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 9:05:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/7/2004
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/7/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
project is not currently programmed and should be considered around 15+ years <br />out. <br /> <br />2.) Mn/ DOT has made a verbal commitment to contribute $300,000 to this <br />project. This was based on 1000 feet of 20' wall at $15/sq. ft.Our current <br />estimates are using $17/sq.ft. Would Mn/DOT be willing to increase their <br />financial commitment to this project? <br /> No, Mn/DOT can't commit any more program dollars, but we are going to do <br />the construction inspection on this project. So, that, in essence, is contributing at <br />least $24,000 (based on $300,000 project and 8% for inspection). <br /> <br />3.) Assuming that Mn/DOT approves the plans by mid July and bids are <br />received in early September, when would these fund be available? <br /> The $300,000 is programmed for FY 2006. Therefore the funds would be <br />available at the time of letting anytime after July 1, 2005. However, if the project <br />is ready earlier, I will ask if this funding can be advanced to FY 2005. No <br />guarantees, but I will try. <br /> <br />4.) Would Mn/DOT ever consider a contract whereby the City, using its <br />funds, constructs noise walls and berms in areas where Mn/DOT will have <br />a future obligation and have Mn/DOT reimburse the City, at a future date, <br />when Mn/DOT would have constructed these noise abatement items? <br />Probably not. Hard to track on projects that are 25+ years out. The Legislature <br />passed authority to allow loans to local units of government to advance <br />construction of projects on IRC's (TH 10 qualifies). However, the condition is <br />that the project has to be in Mn/DOT's 10 -year program. (Additional noisewalls <br />on TH 10 do not qualify). <br /> <br />Also, when lanes are added in the future, they will qualify as an expansion <br />project, which is eligible for Federal funds. The noise wall would then be paid for <br />with 80% Federal Funds and 20% State funds, so we would only be able to give <br />back 20% to the City (Feds won't pay for something already built). If we waited <br />and went the normal route (noise wall construction only), this project is 57 out of <br />70 on list, so it would be 28 years out using all State funds and 100% <br />reimbursement to the City. Mn/DOT does not commit to reimbursement for <br />projects this far out. Sorry. <br /> <br />Staff has invited Mr. Pafkop to the Work Session. Mr. Pafko has accepted and <br />may be bring along one or two other experts. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.