Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 30, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />A Representative of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik addressed Council and provided information 270 <br />on the requirements of the NPDES Phase II Permit. 271 <br /> 272 <br />Mayor Sonterre asked whether it was possible at all for Staff to meet the deadline regardless of 273 <br />the cost savings to use BRAA. 274 <br /> 275 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he would need to devote 100% of his time and it is not 276 <br />realistically possible. 277 <br /> 278 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5911, a 279 <br />Resolution Authorizing the Engineering Firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates 280 <br />(BRAA) to Assist in the Preparation of the NPDES Phase II Permit. 281 <br /> 282 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 283 <br /> 284 <br />D. Resolution 5898 Authorizing the Execution of the Contract for Catering and 285 <br />Banquet Management Services Between the City of Mounds View and 286 <br />Elegant Thymes 287 <br /> 288 <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that Council had directed Staff to work with the City 289 <br />Attorney to provide a contract for review in this matter. She then explained that the contract that 290 <br />is before Council combines the catering and management aspects and changes the method in 291 <br />which payment is made in order to make things less confusing. She further explained that the 292 <br />payment had been changed to a flat dollar amount and all references to gross or net revenues 293 <br />have been removed from the contract. 294 <br /> 295 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that the contract is a combination of the two agreements that 296 <br />existed for catering and management of the facility providing a vast simplification of the 297 <br />payments and minor revisions to a number of aspects to make the language consistent as well as 298 <br />to simplify interpretation of the contract. 299 <br /> 300 <br />Council Member Stigney asked why this method would be better for the City. 301 <br /> 302 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that this contract is better because it simplifies the payment 303 <br />method. He also indicated that Staff discussed the incentive to generate revenue and there is a 304 <br />clause requiring a meeting with Council to set a goal. 305 <br /> 306 <br />City Administrator Miller indicated it would simplify the administration of the contract and the 307 <br />finance director felt that would be helpful. She also noted that MMKR’s audit had indicated that 308 <br />the contract language was confusing and this contract would simplify the language. 309 <br /> 310 <br />Council Member Stigney commented that the contractor could do nothing and still get a flat rate. 311 <br /> 312 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated the contract requires the contractor to meet with Council to set 313 <br />objectives and the contract can be terminated if Council’s goals are not met. 314