Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />• The amount of assessment assigned to a particular property cannot <br />exceed the increase value that property receives as a result of the street <br />major maintenance project (or any public improvement project). <br />• All properties that have the same land use zone are assigned <br />assessments using the same methodology. <br />• The amount of the assessment assigned to a particular property cannot be <br />based on the value of that property. <br /> <br />Given these guidelines, cities are then left to develop their own methodology and <br />policies of assigning assessments. These often vary greatly depending on the <br />rationale they elect to use. <br />The City of Mounds View‘s current assessment policy as it relates to this project <br />would require that the amount of the assessment for a particular property be <br />based on a front foot basis. Other methods used by cities include: based on the <br />area of the benefited property, based partially on frontage footage and partly on <br />the area of the benefited property, based on the square footage of the primary <br />structure on that property, etc. In many cases, after the methodology is selected, <br />many cities then reduce the amount of the assessment by only applying a <br />percentage of the total project cost. In Mounds View’s case, the amount of the <br />assessment is based on 100% of the actual cost of the project, then divided on a <br />front footage basis not to exceed $14.62 per front foot (this maximum amount is <br />adjusted annually in accordance with the Engineering News Record -ENR). <br /> <br />When developing street assessment policies, the paramount objective is to <br />identify the City’s plan as it relates to street major maintenance projects. <br />Although a formal statement or resolution has not been given by the Council on <br />this matter, some Council members have indicated to some degree that: <br /> <br />A. We should treat all properties fairly. <br />B. We should apply maintenance strategies at the proper time and to the <br />proper streets so as to minimize the overall cost to the City and increase <br />the overall benefit to the residents. <br />C. We should develop a street program that is supported by the public and <br />can be supported financially by the City. <br /> <br />A. We should treat all properties fairly. <br />Land value appraisal studies have indicated that all properties benefit <br />approximately the same amount from a neighborhood street major maintenance <br />project with roughly similar lot sizes and similar housing stock. This would <br />indicate that the City should assess equal amounts to all residential properties <br />within a project area. <br /> <br />Case in point: assume two $150,000 homes in a project area. One house sits on <br />a corner lot, the other is at the end of a cul-de-sac. According to a benefit <br />appraisal, both properties would receive the same benefit; however, under the