My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:34 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 9:43:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Lee assured Council that the data has been removed and indicated that smashing 1 <br />the hard drives poses a hazardous waste issue from mercury contamination. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the computers were functional and if they could be donated. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the computers are not functioning. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Quick asked what were they used for. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated all areas of City Hall. 10 <br /> 11 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Approve Consent Agenda Item F But Requiring that the 12 <br />Hard Drives be Removed and Manually Destroyed. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Council Member Quick said he feels Staff needs to pull the hard drives and crush them. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he thought it was redundant to send them out for disposal if they will 17 <br />be destroyed in house. 18 <br /> 19 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1(Stigney) Motion carried. 20 <br /> 21 <br />8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 <br /> 23 <br />A. 2003 Street Improvement Project Issues 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Staff recommends an assessment policy to assign a portion of 26 <br />the project costs to the benefited properties based on the total project costs and not a fixed dollar 27 <br />amount. He then indicated this could be included in the feasibility report to make comparisons. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Marty indicated he thought it was a good idea as there have been issues in the past 30 <br />and the less people are directly assessed the less of an issue they have with what goes out in front of 31 <br />their house. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated the feasibility study would include a mock assessment roll with a 34 <br />list of the properties and the proposed assessment. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Quick asked when the information would be provided to Council. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he hopes to provide the information to Council in March. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated Staff is looking for direction on the street standard and 41 <br />recommends a 28-foot wide street. 42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.