Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the City Attorney was saying there was never a claim 1 <br />submitted to the City. 2 <br /> 3 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated no claim was ever submitted to the City. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Quick commented that he seems to recall that Mr. Linke, prior to his election, 6 <br />sent a letter to the City requesting funds. 7 <br /> 8 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that there is nothing pending, as Council said it would not accept 9 <br />the request. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Quick asked for clarification as to whether or not that would constitute a claim. 12 <br /> 13 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated there is nothing to act on at this time. 14 <br /> 15 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney. To Remove Mrs. Linke’s Name from Appointment to the 16 <br />Park and Recreation Committee. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Linke asked why. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Quick said because of potential litigation. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Mayor Linke said she has the experience and the application was there in August and he is not 23 <br />sure why the former Mayor did nothing with it. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Marty suggested postponing appointments to Park and Recreation because he 26 <br />recalls there was an individual who had said he submitted an application and he would like to 27 <br />check with him. He then said that, if there is an issue with Sharon in the future, she could be 28 <br />removed from the Committee but, at this time, there is nothing filed so he would not have 29 <br />anything against appointing her. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there was a motion on the floor and Council Member Marty’s 32 <br />discussion was out of order. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Quick indicated he had offered a friendly amendment not a motion. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Linke indicated that an amendment is a motion to amend the main motion. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Stigney commented that over and above the potential litigation issue he would 39 <br />like to see if there are other outstanding applications that Council has not seen. 40 <br /> 41 <br /> Ayes – 2 Nays – 3 (Linke/Marty/Gunn) Motion failed. 42 <br /> 43 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To Postpone Appointments to the Park and Recreation 44 <br />Committee to Allow Time to Determine Whether There are Other Applications. 45