Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: Item 09D <br />Meeting Date: April 14, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 710, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 1111 of the Mounds View <br />Zoning Code Relating to the R-O Zoning District -- <br />Planning Case TX03-001 <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The property owner residing at and operating a business at 2865 County Highway 10 has <br />requested an amendment to Chapter 1111 of the Zoning Code relating to the permitted uses <br />allowed within the R-O Zoning district. The Code indicates that accessory uses within an R- <br />O district are regulated as they are in the R-4 zoning district, which is the same for an R-3 <br />district, and so on. In the single-family district, an accessory building may not exceed 952 <br />square feet without a conditional use permit and that the total square footage of all <br />accessory use space shall not exceed 1,800 square feet. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The property owner asserts that the zoning requirements relating to the size of his garage, <br />which is his place of business, are too restrictive and not in keeping with the intent of the <br />Residential Office district. According to the Zoning Code, the purpose of the district is as <br />follows: <br /> <br />The purpose of the R-0, Residential Office District is to provide for high-density <br />residential use and for the transition in land use from residential to low intensity <br />business allowing for the intermixing of such uses. <br /> <br />The intent is to allow for a more dense development, with or without a commercial <br />component. In other words, this district is a true “mixed use” district. Given that commercial <br />and residential uses are allowed on the site at the same time, there are in effect two principal <br />uses. As such, the garage area in this case should not be considered accessory but rather <br />principal, and should not be subject to the accessory garage requirements as articulated in <br />the single-family residential district. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the request on February 19, 2003 and determined there <br />was justification to make a change. On March 5, 2003, the Commission adopted a <br />resolution recommending a change to the Zoning Code to allow for the addition of the <br />following language to Section 1111.02, Permitted Uses: <br /> <br />Automotive Accessory Installation Operations <br />