My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/04/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/04/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:40 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 10:32:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/28/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/28/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUD Amendment Report <br />April 28, 2003 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action: <br /> <br />Based upon its review of the adverse effects and analysis to determine consistency with the <br />Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission prepared a “Finding of Fact” and <br />recommended that the proposed PUD amendment be approved. Their resolution, Resolution <br />725-03, is attached for the Council’s review. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />Based upon the above review of potential adverse effects, it app ears that there is sufficient <br />basis to accept an amendment to the Theater PUD to allow for an office use on Outparcel A <br />as an acceptable alternative to a restaurant. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Hold the public hearing and discuss the proposed PUD amendment and con sider any <br />additional potential adverse effects associated with the amendment. If the City Council <br />concurs with the Planning Commission’s recommendation, Resolution 5997 is available for <br />your action this evening. If the Council would like to postpone cons ideration of this matter <br />pending receipt of additional information, a tabling action would be in order. If the Council is <br />opposed to the amendment request, direction would be needed to draft a resolution denying <br />the request. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Interim City Administrator <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. Development Application <br />2. Zoning Map <br />3. Proposed Site Plan <br />4. Resolution 725-03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.