Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 13, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested Staff look into whether the City could withhold renewal of 2 <br />licenses for failure to pay utilities. He then said it may be possible to collect the business 3 <br />delinquencies a different way rather than through assessing. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Finance Director Hansen cautioned the Council against making subjective determinations on 6 <br />ways to collect different accounts. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if Sam’s has contacted the City. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that the utility billing person handles that type of matter. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested Staff look into the matter a little further. He then said that 13 <br />some people may be legitimately strapped for cash but there are some that may be abusing. 14 <br /> 15 <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated Staff would cross check the list with the business licenses to 16 <br />see if there is any leverage with issuing the licenses. He then said it would be his 17 <br />recommendation to approve as it is consistent with current policy and Staff can look at different 18 <br />policies for businesses if Council desires. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council agreed not to read the list. 21 <br /> 22 <br />A resident asked how long the people have been delinquent. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that this list was delinquent as of May 31, 2003. 25 <br /> 26 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Waive the Reading and approve Resolution 6123, a 27 <br />Resolution Adopting a Special Assessment Levy for Delinquent Public Utility Accounts. 28 <br /> 29 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 30 <br /> 31 <br /> B. County Road H2 Street Improvement Project – Assessment Issues 32 <br /> 33 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated there have been three main issues with this project. The 34 <br />first is the increase in the assessment amounts from what was communicated when the feasibility 35 <br />report came out and that was due to an increase in the water main installation cost. The second 36 <br />issue is that there are five properties with rear yard frontage and one with side yard frontage and 37 <br />they are included in the 2003 street improvement project proposed for 2004 so the issue is how to 38 <br />deal with these properties. The third issue is interest on the project that has not been completed. 39 <br />He then indicated that Council does have the right to assess for the project at any time and some 40 <br />communities do assess prior to the commencement of the project. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Linke asked whether the engineer’s estimate was way off or how the water main cost 43 <br />ended up double. 44 <br /> 45