My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:02 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:36:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/10/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 27, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br /> <br />proposal to the City. He then said he would like to issue the RFP’s right away rather than 1 <br />waiting. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Scott Waste indicated that he would be contacting Council because he thinks it is imperative to 4 <br />open this up for competition. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Mr. Hutchinson indicated that Scott would like an RFP as soon as possible which he feels is 7 <br />reasonable. He then said that there have been discussions with at least one party and he thinks it 8 <br />would fulfill some due process if they could discuss the matter with Staff. He then pointed out 9 <br />that Council was about to vote on a proposal that takes $10,000 of the Mermaid’s money and 10 <br />gives him the only opportunity to do the interim management and he thinks that is an unusual 11 <br />arrangement for a City to accept private funding to buy out another contract and give it to that 12 <br />entity as almost a reward for that contribution which he thinks is a quid pro quo and Council 13 <br />ought to endorse an RFP at the earliest possible time. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mr. Hutchinson indicated that the busiest season is always the holiday season and suggested 16 <br />doing the RFP right now and allow the new vendor to take advantage of the holiday season. He 17 <br />then said that he would encourage Council to give Mr. Waste the opportunity to present a 18 <br />proposal for the interim rather than run the risk of impropriety. He further commented that he 19 <br />does not question the motives but it seems to have the appearance that it is unusual and he would 20 <br />recommend protecting the City by talking with others and moving to the RFP’s as soon as 21 <br />possible. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mayor Linke asked whether Council should table this for further information. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mr. Hall commented that Mr. Hutchinson had made a very smooth threat. He then said that he 26 <br />has been negotiating with the City on this matter and the $10,000 is to keep things clear and 27 <br />separate as he does not commingle his work with anyone else’s in an effort to preserve his 28 <br />reputation and the reputation of his business. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested that Mr. Hall buy out Mr. Bradley to make this a clean break 31 <br />rather than involving the City. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Mr. Hall indicated he is willing to help the City out and he is not the one that drove the bookings 34 <br />down from 25 per month to 10 per month. He then said that he does not want to do anything 35 <br />backwards he wants this nice and clean and up front so that the residents of Mounds View see 36 <br />that nothing improper has been done. 37 <br /> 38 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Postpone this Matter for Further Information to Know 39 <br />where the City Stands Legally and Obtain Other Options. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Stigney asked City Attorney Riggs to look up whether there is discussion 42 <br />allowed on a postponing motion. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.