Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />C. Resolution 6132, a Resolution Hiring Steven Vacek as the Public Works 1 <br />Mechanic 2 <br />D. Resolution 6133, a Resolution Approving a Sewer Connection and Maintenance 3 <br />Agreement with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 4 <br />E. Establish an Executive Session Immediately Following the Meeting to Review 5 <br />Contract Negotiations 6 <br /> 7 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To Approve the Consent Agenda as Presented. 8 <br /> 9 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 10 <br /> 11 <br />9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 12 <br /> 13 <br />A. Mounds View Banquet Center Interim Agreement 14 <br /> 15 <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated that the settlement agreement with the caterer has the vendor 16 <br />leaving on November 11, 2003 and an RFP was done for Mounds View businesses that had 17 <br />liquor and catering licenses to submit proposals to take over the service starting on November 12, 18 <br />2003. He then indicated that three businesses qualify, The Mermaid, Roberts and Jakes and 19 <br />proposals were received from Roberts and The Mermaid. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Administrator Ulrich requested that Council discuss the proposals and accept one of them. 22 <br />He then said that the agreement had been amended to include language that the City is not 23 <br />obligated to reimburse the manager for events booked beyond the 60 day period once the 24 <br />manager has been terminated and the manager agrees not to schedule any events at the banquet 25 <br />center after having been terminated. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman briefly reviewed the proposals with Council. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Staff had reviewed the proposals 30 <br />using seven criteria. He then said that both businesses have said they are willing to have an on 31 <br />site individual at the banquet center thought it was not a requirement under the RFP. He also 32 <br />indicated that the Waste family has a number of people with a lot of good experience with 33 <br />marketing and sales and The Mermaid has six people with good experience with marketing, sales 34 <br />and catering. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the edge goes to The Mermaid in 37 <br />sales and marketing plan as information on marketing activities was provided for all 12 months 38 <br />of the year. The Roberts proposal discussed some months but not all 12. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that both businesses prefer to go with 41 <br />the minimum monthly rate of $6,000 per month beginning in January of 2004 but Roberts had an 42 <br />additional amount that is 5% of food sales excluding liquor and that would be approximately an 43 <br />additional $10,000 per year. 44 <br /> 45