My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/11/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:13 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/24/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />C. Resolution 6132, a Resolution Hiring Steven Vacek as the Public Works 1 <br />Mechanic 2 <br />D. Resolution 6133, a Resolution Approving a Sewer Connection and Maintenance 3 <br />Agreement with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 4 <br />E. Establish an Executive Session Immediately Following the Meeting to Review 5 <br />Contract Negotiations 6 <br /> 7 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To Approve the Consent Agenda as Presented. 8 <br /> 9 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 10 <br /> 11 <br />9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 12 <br /> 13 <br />A. Mounds View Banquet Center Interim Agreement 14 <br /> 15 <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated that the settlement agreement with the caterer has the vendor 16 <br />leaving on November 11, 2003 and an RFP was done for Mounds View businesses that had 17 <br />liquor and catering licenses to submit proposals to take over the service starting on November 12, 18 <br />2003. He then indicated that three businesses qualify, The Mermaid, Roberts and Jakes and 19 <br />proposals were received from Roberts and The Mermaid. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Administrator Ulrich requested that Council discuss the proposals and accept one of them. 22 <br />He then said that the agreement had been amended to include language that the City is not 23 <br />obligated to reimburse the manager for events booked beyond the 60 day period once the 24 <br />manager has been terminated and the manager agrees not to schedule any events at the banquet 25 <br />center after having been terminated. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman briefly reviewed the proposals with Council. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Staff had reviewed the proposals 30 <br />using seven criteria. He then said that both businesses have said they are willing to have an on 31 <br />site individual at the banquet center thought it was not a requirement under the RFP. He also 32 <br />indicated that the Waste family has a number of people with a lot of good experience with 33 <br />marketing and sales and The Mermaid has six people with good experience with marketing, sales 34 <br />and catering. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the edge goes to The Mermaid in 37 <br />sales and marketing plan as information on marketing activities was provided for all 12 months 38 <br />of the year. The Roberts proposal discussed some months but not all 12. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that both businesses prefer to go with 41 <br />the minimum monthly rate of $6,000 per month beginning in January of 2004 but Roberts had an 42 <br />additional amount that is 5% of food sales excluding liquor and that would be approximately an 43 <br />additional $10,000 per year. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.