Laserfiche WebLink
Code Enforcement Presentation <br />February 3, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />code violations. Staff has found that dealing with the issue prior to a complaint can <br />revitalize the appearance of the entire neighborhood, while stopping the spread or <br />urban blight which can cause the entire neighborhood to become deteriorated. <br /> <br />While investigating a code violation, Staff researches files to determine if prior <br />involvement has occurred at the subject property, Staff then visits the property, and <br />often times speaks directly with the responsible party, speaks with neighbors, and takes <br />photographs. In this respect, it is important to note that Staff performing these initial <br />investigation steps serves both the complainant and the violator, and Staff is responsive <br />to their respective needs. <br /> <br />Staff regularly expresses a willingness to communicate with the complainant, when the <br />identity is known. Staff respectfully communicates to the violator what must be done to <br />resolve the situation. This process regularly involves working with a violator to <br />determine how his or her situation can conform to the satisfaction of both the violator <br />and the City. This does not mean compromising standards or lengthening timelines for <br />compliance without cause, staff feels that it is important to not start the compliance <br />transaction on a hostile note. However, only the violator can solve the problem <br />efficiently. <br /> <br />After Staff has collected the facts, Staff must evaluate whether or not violations exist <br />and, if so, what steps are to be taken to bring about compliance. Once inspection of the <br />property reveals code violations, Staff notifies the responsible person to seek <br />compliance. Generally, the responsible party is the property owner, but may also <br />include the tenant, lessee, or occupant depending on the violation. Compliance can be <br />obtained by using one or a combination of administrative and judicial remedies. <br /> <br />Since most violations exist through simple, unintentional ignorance of a regulation, the <br />majority of cases are resolved soon after this initial notice. About 90 percent of code <br />violation cases voluntarily comply with the cited regulation. However, Staff may use <br />nearly all of its resources to bring the remaining 10 percent of cases into compliance. <br />As much as similar code violations are the same, they are also different due to the <br />various social and economic situations present. As such, Staff must constantly evaluate <br />the various compliance remedies on a case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />Evaluating remedies is the heart of code enforcement. Enforcement remedies are the <br />basic legal tools and mechanisms that can be used by Staff to gain compliance. Three <br />broad classifications of remedies exist, Administrative, Criminal Prosecution, and <br />Civil Injunction. Staff’s primary objective here is to select the most appropriate remedy <br />to gain timely and effective compliance. To avoid unnecessary delay, Staff needs to <br />select the most effective remedy as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Administrative remedies are used by Staff to gain compliance with codes and <br />regulations on a regular basis. Administrative remedies are classified as informal or <br />formal. Informal administrative remedies include a notice of violation, stop work orders, <br />and the issuance of an administrative offense citation. <br /> <br />