My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/02/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:14 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:47:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/3/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No. 8 <br />Meeting Date: February 3, 2002 <br />Type of Business: WS City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Resolution 5555 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION: <br /> <br />Mayor Linke has asked that the City Council review Resolution 5555 at this worksession <br />meeting. This resolution was adopted in part to reaffirm the role of the City Administrator <br />as well as to reaffirm and further define the communication process between employees <br />and the City Council. Much of the basis for this resolution is found in the City’s Charter. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />Resolution 5555 does not in any way prohibit or restrict City Council members from <br />contacting or speaking directly with employees. The resolution does, however, indicate <br />that employee communication to the Council be channeled through the City Administrator. <br /> <br />If the City Council finds this policy to be too restrictive, a new resolution could be adopted <br />which would supersede Resolution 5555 to the extent pertaining to employee <br />communication with the City Council. But for what it’s worth, I believe—in general--the <br />policy of channeling communication through the city administrator is worth preserving. <br />Bypassing direct supervisors, department directors and the administrator with information <br />to the Council could result in a management staff unaware of important matters, delaying <br />potentially necessary and timely action or response. <br /> <br />Should employees be prohibited from speaking to the Council? No. Should an employee <br />be reprimanded for speaking to the Council? Again, No. Should an employee however <br />use common sense and follow the “chain of command” in most cases? Yes. Doing so <br />promotes an organized, informed and responsive workplace. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />If the Council feels that Resolution 5555 is inappropriate or no longer serves its <br />intended purpose, the Council may rescind the resolution. If the Council would like to <br />modify or clarify the intent of Resolution 5555, a new resolution could be drafted to <br />amend specific sections or parts of the original resolution. Or, Resolution 5555 can <br />stand on its own unchanged with or without a new resolution drafted to articulate the <br />Councils position on communication. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />James Ericson
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.