Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 4 <br />Meeting Date: March 3, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Worksession <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Interim City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Discussion Regarding the Planning Commission <br />Recommendation to Post the East Side of Greenfield <br />Avenue as No Parking 350 Feet to Corner. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: <br /> <br />On September 13, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 633-00 which <br />approved a variance to Tony Mezzenga, a developer proposing to construct an office <br />building at 2402 County Road I. The variance allowed a reduced parking ratio of one space <br />per 200 square feet. (The standard ratio is three spaces plus one space per 175 square feet <br />of leaseable space.) The developer had indicated that the resulting parking requirement of <br />15 stalls was more than adequate. <br /> <br />Upon completion of the construction, Mr. Mezzenga sold the building to Mr. Steve Farrell and <br />it became readily apparent soon afterward that vehicles destined for the Farrell building were <br />overflowing across the street onto Greenfield Avenue. Mr. Farrell confirmed to City staff that <br />the 15-stall parking lot was not adequate for his business, employees and clients. Because <br />of the regular overflow parking on Greenfield and complaints from residents, the Planning <br />Commission discussed the possibility of posting the east side of Greenfield Avenue south of <br />County Road I as “No Parking”. (The west side of Greenfield is already posted “No <br />Parking.”) While the Planning Commission often reviews No Parking requests, the ultimate <br />authority lies with the City Council. The Council takes into consideration the Planning <br />Commission’s recommendation along with the recommendation of Staff, the Police <br />Department and affected property owners. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />Resolution 633-00 approved a reduced parking ratio of one space per 200 square feet of <br />leaseable space. At just less than 3,000 square feet, the number of stalls required was 15, <br />one of which had to be handicapped accessible. If the typical standards were applied to this <br />building, the number of parking stalls required would have been 20, five more than what was <br />approved by the variance. Because there is not enough room for a twenty-stall parking lot <br />given the size of the lot and the building, the leaseable space in the building would have to <br />have been reduced by almost a third. <br /> <br />Staff checked with the Police Department who indicated that there were no typical standards <br />for reviewing “No Parking” requests. Under the direction of then Acting Chief Brennan, <br />members of the MVPD observed the intersection and the parking along Greenfield and have <br />concluded there were no critical safety issues associated with the vehicles parked on <br />Greenfield Avenue. At the December18, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, Officer Terry