My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:44 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 11:50:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 12 <br />Meeting Date: March 3, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Worksession <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review and Discuss Issues Relating to “At Will” <br />Employee <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />The Council asked to discuss this item further at a worksession. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The League of Minnesota Cities indicates the following regarding the issue of “At Will“ <br />employees: <br /> <br />I don’t think we would advise the City to go back to have a probationary period for <br />employees, the reason is, a probationary period implies that after it’s over, you’re no <br />longer an “at will” employee, you have some special protected status. And that’s why <br />attorneys, our attorneys here, have been advising cities to remove that language from <br />their employee handbooks. Because if your employees are not covered by a union <br />contract or a civil service system, hopefully you have language in your employee <br />handbook that considers them all to be—everyone--probationary, non-probationary, <br />everyone, “at will” employees. Once you establish a probationary period, you imply <br />that when the employee has passed that, that they have some special protections <br />and are no longer “at will”. That’s why you take that off and just say, everybody’s “at <br />will”, all the time, we can fire anybody, anytime, any reason. And not that the League <br />would advise cities to do that, fire anybody anytime for any reason, but, preserving <br />that right to do that, because in Minnesota, we still do have an “at will” employment <br />state, helps in various kinds of lawsuits that might come up, wrongful termination, etc. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Discuss and provide direction to staff, if any direction is determined to be necessary. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Interim City Clerk/Administrator <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.