My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/06/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:15 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 12:00:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/2/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/2/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 5 <br />Meeting Date: June 2, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Worksession <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: City Council Priorities <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />At recent meetings of the City Council, there has been some discussion regarding individual <br />priorities of the Council, and at the meeting on May 19, 2003, a list was compiled which is <br />attached to this report, labeled “City Council Priorities and Concerns – 2003”. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />While all of the concerns and priorities listed are worthy, we are probably not able to focus <br />on all of the issues at the same time or at the same level of attention. Some concerns are <br />ongoing (such as Code Enforcement) while others are more time sensitive (such as filling the <br />soon to be vacant space at the community center.) Given the number of vacancies on staff, <br />the Council may want to focus on a handful of these priorities and direct staff accordingly. <br /> <br />To accomplish this, it might be helpful to rank ALL of the concerns and priorities. To <br />accomplish this, I made a list of the priorities, removing duplicate or similar entries. Each <br />priority could be ranked individually from one to five with “1” being low and “5” being high <br />priority. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Discuss and direct staff accordingly. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Interim City Clerk/Administrator <br /> <br />Attachments:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.