Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 6 <br />Meeting Date: June 2, 2003 <br />Type of Business: Worksession <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Acting City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review of Legal Services Responses to RFP <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />I have concluded my review and assessment of the City Attorney proposals and would like to <br />share with you my findings and to identify those firms considered to be candidates for <br />interview. While all of you have had the responses for a few weeks, you may not have <br />reviewed the proposals to the extent and depth that I did, and for that reason I have provided <br />you with some summary tables and documentation which I used to help identify those firms <br />to interview. <br /> <br />Summary: <br /> <br />Thirteen firms responded to the RFP, ten of which submitted proposals to provide the City <br />with civil representation. Two firms (Frank Madden & Associates and Krass Monroe) offered <br />to provide only a subset of services and were not considered. Three of the ten forms also <br />offered to provide the City with prosecution services while a fourth firm, Hughes & Costello, <br />offered only to provide prosecution services. <br /> <br />Selection Criteria: <br /> <br />My assessment of the firms was based on a number of factors, such as experience, firm <br />depth, cost of services and retainer amount. As you can see from the table entitled <br />“Services Covered under Retainer Agreement” most of the firms are similar in what is <br />covered under the retainer. Some include more than others, however most indicate that <br />general legal issues are covered while financing, litigation and other defense or <br />representation would be outside the scope of the retainer. <br /> <br />Because the proposed services covered under the retainer were similar, I ranked firms in <br />order of the cost of the annual retainer, followed by depth of firm and then the overall <br />presentation of their proposal. Through this ranking effort, I have identified four firms to <br />interview—Kelly & Fawcett, Winthrop & Weinstine, Barna Guzy & Steffen, and Halleland <br />Lewis Nilan Sipkins & Johnson. <br /> <br />Interviews: <br /> <br />Assuming the Council raises no objections, I would like to schedule interviews with the firms <br />either later this week or early in the following week. Greg Lee, Mike Sommer, Charlie <br />Hansen and I will make up the interview panel. If a council member would like to take part in <br />the interviews, either as a passive observer or an active participant, simply let me know. I <br />imagine that the interviews could be accomplished in a single day with a block of time in the <br />morning and a block in the afternoon. <br />