My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2003/09/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Agenda Packets - 2003/09/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:47 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 12:09:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/2/2003
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/2/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />Assessment Policy <br />To finance a neighborhood street major maintenance project most cities rely on <br />assessment of the benefited properties to finance a portion of the project. <br /> <br />However, there are State Law requirements that govern various aspects of <br />assigning assessments: <br />• The amount of assessment assigned to a particular property cannot <br />exceed the increase value that property receives as a result of the street <br />major maintenance project (or any public improvement project). <br />• All properties that have the same land use zone are assigned <br />assessments using the same methodology. <br />• The amount of the assessment assigned to a particular property cannot be <br />based on the value of that property. <br /> <br />Given these guidelines, cities are then left to develop their own methodology and <br />policies of assigning assessments. These often vary greatly depending on the <br />rationale they elect to use. <br />The City of Mounds View‘s current assessment policy as it relates to this project <br />would require that the amount of the assessment for a particular property be <br />based on a front foot basis. Other methods used by cities include: based on the <br />area of the benefited property, based partially on frontage footage and partly on <br />the area of the benefited property, based on the square footage of the primary <br />structure on that property, etc. In many cases, after the methodology is selected, <br />many cities then reduce the amount of the assessment by only applying a <br />percentage of the total project cost. In Mounds View’s case, the amount of the <br />assessment is based on 100% of the actual cost of the project, then divided on a <br />front footage basis not to exceed $14.62 per front foot (this maximum amount is <br />adjusted annually in accordance with the Engineering News Record -ENR). <br /> <br />When developing street assessment policies, the paramount objective is to <br />identify the City’s plan as it relates to street major maintenance projects. <br />Although a formal statement or resolution has not been given by the Council on <br />this matter, some Council members have indicated to some degree that: <br /> <br />A. We should treat all properties fairly. <br />B. We should apply maintenance strategies at the proper time and to the <br />proper streets so as to minimize the overall cost to the City and increase <br />the overall benefit to the residents. <br />C. We should develop a street program that is supported by the public and <br />can be supported financially by the City. <br /> <br />A. We should treat all properties fairly. <br />Land value appraisal studies have indicated that all properties benefit <br />approximately the same amount from a neighborhood street major maintenance
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.