My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/01/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/01/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 12:21:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/7/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/7/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M:\MasterFiles\1999 thru 2010\2002\City Council\Council Packets\01-07-02 CC\Item 08A--Harstad Appeal Report.doc <br />Item No: 8A <br />Meeting Date: January 7, 2002 <br />Type of Business: CB <br />WK: Work Session; PH: Public Hearing; <br />CA: Consent Agenda; CB: Council Business City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Consideration of an Appeal of a Planning <br />Commission Denial of the Variance Requested by <br />Harstad Companies Regarding the Proposed <br />Longview Estates Major Subdivision <br /> Planning Case VR01-010 <br />Date of Report: January 2, 2002 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />This item was on the Council’s agenda on December 10, 2001. After significant <br />discussion and input from the public and the applicant, a vote was taken to deny the <br />request to overturn the denial. This vote failed and the item was tabled for action on <br />January 7, 2002. I am merely attaching the report from December 10, 2001, as none of <br />the facts have changed. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The issue, in summary, is whether or not there is sufficient hardship to warrant approving <br />the variance and overturning the Planning Commission’s denial. Staff has indicated that <br />a case could be made to justify the approval of the variance, but we did not offer a <br />recommendation regarding the request. After recent conversations with the City’s <br />engineering consultants, staff is less inclined to support the variance approval. A <br />representative from SEH will be in attendance for the meeting to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Discuss and further consider the request to overturn the Planning Commission denial of a <br />variance to deviate from supplemental zoning requirements within a wetland zoning <br />district. <br /> <br /> <br />_____________________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Community Development Director <br />763-717-4021 <br /> <br />Attachment: <br /> <br />1. Council Report from Dec 10, 2001
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.