Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 7, 2002 <br />Special Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked what the warranty would have been if the equipment were not in <br />a public setting. He then indicated that the Mayor was told, when he placed the order, that the <br />equipment was for in home use. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the equipment was purchased through a catalog and she is <br />not sure that anyone on Staff checked to see if was commercial equipment. She also indicated <br />that, when the City took ownership of the equipment, no one checked the equipment either. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney commented that it was his understanding, during closed session <br />discussions, that when TSS placed the order Reebok informed Mr. Sonterre that the equipment <br />was for in home use and was not to be used in a commercial setting. He then said he feels that <br />the Mayor, as owner of TSS, should uphold whatever the warranty would have been. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that it was the opinion of Reebok that he was made aware of the fact <br />that the equipment was in home equipment and he has disputed that fact. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that Mayor Sonterre sold the equipment knowing it was going <br />into a commercial setting. He then indicated that since the equipment is not covered by warranty <br />he feels the person who sold the equipment, Mayor Sonterre, should provide whatever the <br />Reebok warranty would have been <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that the equipment was part of an apparel catalog and he does not sell <br />the equipment and knows nothing about it. He indicated he never received any information on <br />the product other than the two-page portion of the apparel catalog. He then explained that while <br />on the Parks Commission he offered the catalog to the Commission because the Commission was <br />interested in purchasing equipment for the Community Center. He further explained that his only <br />involvement in the process was to provide the catalog and allow the City to use his account with <br />the vendor to purchase the equipment. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated he had provided the catalog with the understanding that City Staff <br />would review the equipment before making its recommendation to the Commission and Council. <br />He then indicated that, at the following Commission meeting, pictures of the equipment were <br />shown and information given that the YMCA had decided to purchase the equipment. He further <br />indicated that he had no conversations with anyone concerning the equipment prior to the <br />decision being made to purchase the equipment. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that he never intended to do anything other than facilitate the sale. He <br />indicated that he does not sell the equipment and never made any claims concerning that <br />equipment. He then commented that, if it is determined that there were billing errors made by his <br />company, he would stand by his word and take care of it. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney commented that he believes Mayor Sonterre was aware at the time that <br />the equipment was for in home use. He then said if, as claimed, the Mayor was not aware he is <br />aware now. Council Member Stigney asked Mayor Sonterre to provide a warranty equivalent to <br />what would have been provided by Reebok.