My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/02/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:35 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:43:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/25/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br /> <br />Council Member Marty expressed concern with appointing Mr. Miller because he is not a <br />resident of Mounds View and his business office is not in Mounds View. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that previous Council had provided a special condition because Mr. <br />Miller works as a member of Mounds View Public Schools. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated she had reviewed the other applications and feels it would be <br />beneficial to have Mr. Miller on the Police Civil Service Commission because he works for the <br />school district. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he felt it was great that Mr. Miller was interested in <br />volunteering and thanked him for serving. He then said the function of the Police Civil Service <br />Commission is a bit different and there are candidates that live in Mounds View and have a lot of <br />police background qualifications. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated there may be a problem with the appointment because the statute <br />requires the appointees live in the City. He then indicated he would review the matter and report <br />back to Council. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty raised what he feels is another issue concerning the Police Civil Service <br />and that is the fact that Council Member Quick’s spouse services on the Commission. He <br />commented that he sees this as a possible conflict of interest that may also pose an ethical <br />question. He then asked the City Attorney to look into whether it is appropriate to have spouses <br />of Council Members serving on Commissions and Committees within the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre noted that the term of the person being discussed was not presently up and <br />suggested that the City Attorney review the matter and provide a report. He then indicated that <br />he had reviewed information from the League of Minnesota Cities and had not seen anything that <br />would prevent the spouse of a Council Member from serving on Commissions or Committees <br />within the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty commented that due to what came up he was not sure if it was a <br />personality conflict or what it was. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre asked that since the matter was not part of the agenda the matter be set for <br />discussion at the work session in February. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Table This Matter for Further Information. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />9. REPORTS <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed reported that Mr. Hess had asked her to ask Council whether <br />Members wished to continue receiving packets via e-mail.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.