My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/03/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:04 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 2:55:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/5/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/5/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated this matter was removed from the February 25, 2002 <br />meeting agenda at the request of Mr. Serfling from AFSCME. She then indicated the City and <br />the union have not settled on seasonal wages for the golf course employees. She further <br />indicated the issue is the City has not yet settled on wages and needs to open the course shortly so <br />Staff is needed. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated she was asking Council to authorize Staff to hire <br />two employees at 40 hours per week at a maximum of $10.25 per hour for a six month period. <br />She then indicated she is aware that changes to the salary may need to be made based on <br />negotiations with AFSCME. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5713, a <br />Resolution Authorizing Seasonal Golf Course Positions for 2002. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty said he feels it is time to get golf course personnel out at the course <br />because help is needed out there to get it up and running. <br /> <br />Mr. Serfling said he is disappointed that Council is being asked to do this because he had asked <br />that Council vote against the setting of salaries for seasonal employees because the union <br />considers it to be an unfair labor practice. He then commented that the City has been in <br />negotiations with the union since mid-October and it was not until March 5, 2002 that the union <br />received a wage proposal and it was less than what is being proposed to Council tonight and <br />significantly less than what was proposed on February 25, 2002. <br /> <br />Mr. Serfling indicated he had spoken to Ms. Reed about working out something under a <br />temporary agreement and suggested the City could avoid conflict by rehiring employees at last <br />year’s salary. He then commented that unilaterally setting salaries is a violation of the bargaining <br />law that requires good faith negotiations and the union does not think this is a good faith attempt <br />to negotiate. He further asked Council not to approve this resolution. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty pointed out that Ms. Reed had indicated during her presentation that the <br />salary is temporary and subject to change based on wage negotiations with the union. <br /> <br />Mr. Serfling indicated the law requires salaries to be bargained and this salary has not been <br />bargained so rehiring at last summer’s wage would be appropriate. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Sonterre. To Call the Question. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.