Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller then gave a brief overview indicating that the judge found that the <br />applicant was discharged because of employment misconduct and the unemployment judge found <br />that the employee had the training and experience to perform his duties adequately and either <br />chose to create an inadequate accounting system or did not care and his hostility or lack of <br />concern for the employer constitutes misconduct. She further indicated there were 12 findings <br />elaborated in the report and noted briefly that the judge mentions the issue of credit cards, the <br />overuse of credit cards, and the number of cards issued. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked to have the findings of fact read. <br /> <br />City Administrator Miller read the findings of fact from the document. They are as follows: <br /> <br />(1) The applicant worked full-time for the employer from July 8, 1996 until June 7, 2001 as <br />finance director for a final hourly wage of $33.80. <br />(2) The employer is a Minnesota City. <br />(3) It was the applicant’s job to design and administer accounting systems that would <br />accurately show the income and expenditures of the employer. It was also the applicant’s <br />job to provide other city officials with financial information that they needed to <br />administer to their departments. <br />(4) The applicant has been a CPA for several years. Before he was hired for this position, the <br />applicant worked several years in the finance department of another Minnesota city. <br />(5) It is very unusual for a Minnesota city to issue more than one or two credit cards to <br />employees for the purchase of merchandise for the city. When the applicant started <br />working for the employer, the employer had issued one credit card to an employee. <br />During the applicant’s employment, he issued credit cards to more and more employees. <br />At the time of the applicant’s discharge, more than 20 city employees had credit cards <br />they could use to charge purchases against the employer. Two individuals who were not <br />city employees also had city credit cards. The number of credit cards made it impossible <br />for the city to check each purchase to insure that it was for an authorized city purchase. <br />There were employees who used city credit cards to make personal purchases and did not <br />reimburse the employer. The employer took no action regarding those unauthorized <br />charges because the applicant did not know about them or he condoned them. <br />(6) The employer has a strict written policy that city funds will not be used to purchase <br />alcohol beverages. The applicant was aware of this policy. During the applicant’s <br />employment he authorized the reimbursement of employees, including himself, for the <br />purchase of alcoholic beverages. <br />(7) The applicant was uncooperative with other city officials when they asked for financial <br />information. The city administrator asked for a quarterly financial statement she could <br />use in council meetings to help the city plan expenditures. The applicant was at first <br />hostile to this request. After several months, the applicant did provide the administrator <br />with a document he characterized as a financial statement. This document was <br />disorganized and provided little useful information to the administrator or the council. <br />Other department heads complained to the administrator that the applicant was hostile to <br />their requests for information.