My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/04/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/04/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:20 PM
Creation date
8/8/2018 3:14:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/8/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/8/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 7H <br />Meeting Date: April 8, 2002 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community <br />Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss Possible Changes to the City <br />Code which Would Require a Certificate of Occupancy <br />when a Change of Building Occupancy Occurs in the <br />Commercial and Industrial Zoning Districts <br />Date of Report: April 3, 2002 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />This item was presented to the City Council at the April 1, 2002 worksession. To recap <br />that discussion, with this ordinance staff is taking the opportunity to make an improvement <br />to the City Code to require City notification and inspection for every change in occupancy <br />within the commercial and industrial businesses districts. In addition, the ordinance <br />makes some clarifying statements as to the requirements of a certificate of occupancy. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The reasons why this is being put forward for Council review and approval is to protect <br />and safeguard the public safety, as highlighted by the following: <br /> <br />1. The first issue deals with fire response. Often times, our volunteer firefighters enter a <br />business without knowing the nature of the business or the types of materials or <br />hazards that may be present. This lack of knowledge puts the fire responders in <br />dangerous, life-threatening situations that can be avoided with the passage of this <br />type of amendment to the Code. <br /> <br />2. Second, when a new business takes occupancy in a previously occupied building, <br />often times there are no interior build-out modifications needed which would warrant <br />building official and fire marshal review. Since no permit is needed, we are often <br />unaware when a new business occupies space previously held by another company. <br />The issue however is not that we don’t know, it is that the new business may <br />warehouse or produce materials which have a different rating than the previous <br />business, or may store or handle hazardous materials which may require modified <br />sprinkler specifications. Without such a review, not only is the fire department put at <br />risk in the event of a fire, the heath and life-safety of the employees are put at risk if <br />the sprinklers are inadequate or improperly located. <br /> <br />3. Last, this change would allow the Police Department to better maintain its emergency <br />call list so that in the event of an after-hours emergency, there is someone that can be <br />contacted, or someone that can provide access to the building to turn off false alarms. <br /> <br />Ord. 699 Report <br />April 8, 2002
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.