Resolution 8992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Resolution 8992 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council held a duly -noticed Public Hearing for this request on August 13, 2018; and, WHEREAS, according to the Mounds View City Code, Section 1125.0 1, Subd 3, the City Council is to review a standard set of criteria when considering a Conditional Use Permit, including making Findings; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View City Council does hereby find that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.01, Subd 3(b) are satisfied and makes the following Findings of Fact related to its decision: 1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. Finding: The accessory building will have no additional burden onto public services. 2. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and there will be no deterrence to development ofvacant land. Finding: The accessory building will be set back from the side yard 33', which exceeds the minimum 5' setback. It is not anticipated that the accessory building will have any effect on area property values. 3. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. Finding: The addition onto the accessory building will have the same roof pitch and siding as that of the existing accessory building, will complement the home. 4. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Finding: The accessory building to be used for personal storage, is a reasonable use within the R-1 zoning district. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. Finding: The use is consistent with the Zoning Code, and allowable accessory uses within the R-1 zoning district. 6. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City.