My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/07/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/07/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:52 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 6:15:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/8/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/8/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 24, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br /> <br />Council Member Marty noted a report is expected by the end of year and asked if that meant <br />December. <br /> <br />Director Lee said he was being cautious with that estimate but said he suspected the report would <br />be available in September or October and would come to a Council work session. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that he had thought the H2 parking issue had been voted on <br />and the question of parking killed by that vote. <br /> <br />Council agreed. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked where the substance in the water had come from. <br /> <br />Director Lee indicated it is coming from the aquifer and is naturally occurring. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked whether the other wells have it. <br /> <br />Director Lee said yes but in lower levels. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked if the City would we be better off looking at another well. <br /> <br />Director Lee indicated that a new well would be an option but said that a new well costs <br />approximately $800,000. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked whether the well was tested for trichlorylethylene. <br /> <br />Director Lee indicated he was not sure but said that upwards of 200 chemicals were tested. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that it seems that the state expanded the expectations of the <br />City with regard to the noise wall. <br /> <br />Director Lee confirmed that MNDOT has said that any option must include noise abatement for <br />Arden Park. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick asked where the berm would be. <br /> <br />Director Lee indicated the proposal is for MNDOT to install a berm through Arden Park in areas <br />where it is feasible. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick commented that this would be at a cost to the City. <br /> <br />Director Lee said yes according to MNDOT that is the current proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.