My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/07/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/07/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:06 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 6:28:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/22/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/22/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 8, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated he had spoken to a representative of the association, the neighborhood <br />and the developer and they have agreed to meet in the next few days in an attempt to discuss <br />options for the property that would be amenable to all parties. He then said he could vote for <br />either option one or option four. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas admitted she was torn between one and four and said she is cynical <br />that something can be worked out among the parties. <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained that any action tonight would be a direction to Staff to bring forward <br />a Resolution at the next meeting. He then said that, based on discussions during the two-week <br />period the direction could change at that meeting. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick indicated he was in support of option one and said he did not feel Staff <br />should be directed to go another way without a plan in front of him. He also said he would be <br />willing to table if there is a need for further information. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty said he would like to see when this comes back that this comes back as a <br />possible PUD so the City would have more control over it at the City level. <br /> <br />Director Ericson indicated the PUD would give the City more control but said it may be difficult <br />to impose a PUD on the developer. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas said she knew this was an unfair question but asked if Mr. Harstad felt <br />it would be possible to work something out and bring back another option to Council. She then <br />said is there a plan b if this one is not approved. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that Mr. Harstad has expressed a willingness to explore other options <br />and work with neighbors and the City on the matter. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad said he does not have a plan b as this property has numerous challenges to <br />development. He then said he is willing to dialogue with the neighbors and discuss options but <br />he cannot guarantee how that will work out. <br /> <br />Mr. Harstad said he would give the discussions his best efforts. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Direct Staff to Prepare a Resolution Based on Option <br />One of the Staff Report Denying the Rezoning Request. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty said he would like all parties to get together to work something out that <br />is agreeable to as many as possible. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney agreed that this is one way to resolve the matter because if it is drug out <br />past the 60 days it would be automatically approved. <br /> <br />Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.