My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/08/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/08/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:32 PM
Creation date
8/15/2018 1:05:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/12/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/12/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 8, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated he was not sure what has changed or why the letter would not apply to this <br />request but noted he has hired legal representation for the matter. He then said he feels it is <br />bizarre that a rezoning of their land could take place without them being involved. He further <br />stated that they come to Council, who represents the residents, to be fiduciary. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated the common area is the largest portion of the property and said that the <br />association comprised of the six townhome owners pay dues and assessments and no one else <br />does because the other land is vacant. He then said he does not think it makes sense to put in six <br />more units like are already there. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated the townhome owners do not feel it is right and he feels Mr. Riggs letter <br />says that they need to be involved in a zoning request change as they are part of that development <br />and the only ones that live in that development. He then said they do have rights to say what will <br />be done and asked that Council deny this request totally. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan said that his comments do not mean that the association would not support Mr. <br />Harstad in development but they think there are ways to do things and things that must be <br />addressed to resolve the issues to the benefit of all before coming to Council with a proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan asked that Council vote this change down as R-3 is not acceptable to them. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked if Mr. Morgan pays association fees. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan said yes. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked if association fees have been collected since the development <br />began. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated he was not there when the development began but has paid fees since he <br />has lived there. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated the dues go to the association for management of that land including lawn <br />care and snow removal. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty asked when it changed. <br /> <br />Mr. Morgan indicated that Mr. Harstad was collecting in the beginning and he is not sure when <br />that changed. He then said that Mr. Harstad has not paid dues and only owns 66 individual plots <br />and no improved property. He further said that as things take place they have the right to be <br />considered and this development is not fiduciary. <br /> <br />Mayor Sonterre asked City Attorney Riggs to comment on the letter from 1998. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated Mr. Ericson had explained the matter correctly in that the two <br />situations are different and the letter is meant to cover that one specific application. He then said
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.