My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/12/30
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/12/30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:49 PM
Creation date
8/15/2018 1:38:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/30/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/30/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 9, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Chief Zikmund indicated the City would have the challenge of disposing of them whether they <br />are legal or illegal. He then indicated the issue has become less of a concern as the governor- <br />elect has indicated he is not in favor of full legalization of fireworks. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he would lean toward leaving the fee as it is as the vendor <br />selling the product should assume some risk for disposal. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas asked why the vendor should assume part of the disposal if they are <br />doing everything legally. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that anyone selling a product in the City should assume some <br />of the risk and costs for disposal associated with that product. <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas indicated she has an issue with charging a disposal fee when the City <br />has another option for recovering the costs. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the attorney’s fees may exceed the disposal costs trying to be <br />collected. He then said that having the disposal fee is much cleaner. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty indicated he had talked to some business owners who were interested <br />last year in selling fireworks but the $1,000 fee was cost prohibitive as they would not be able to <br />sell enough to make any profit. He then said that he feels reducing the fee for legitimate business <br />is appropriate as they should not have to pay a penalty for selling fireworks lawfully. <br /> <br />Mr. Linke indicated he agreed with Council Member Thomas and likened the disposal fee to <br />charging Saturn for a fee for an accident a car they sell gets into. He then said it would be more <br />appropriate to penalize the perpetrator doing wrong than to penalize all vendors with a disposal <br />fee. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Amend the Fireworks Fee to $550.00. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney reiterated that he thinks someone selling a hazardous product should <br />take some responsibility for the product they sell. <br /> <br />Council Member Quick indicated he agreed with Council Member Stigney and likened the <br />disposal fee to those types of fees charged by a service garage for rags and disposal of hazardous <br />materials. He then said it is the cost of doing business and those selling fireworks should be able <br />to afford to pay a fee for disposal. <br /> <br />Council Member Marty commented that fireworks can be hazardous but so can gasoline and the <br />City does not charge gas stations more because they sell gasoline. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he did not see an analogy between gasoline and fireworks as <br />you do not light gas on fire.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.