My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2002/01/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Agenda Packets - 2002/01/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:01 PM
Creation date
8/15/2018 1:56:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/22/2002
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/22/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL SPEAKS OUT <br /> <br />There has been more than one occasion during the last year where the past practices of <br />the City of Mounds View have been called into question – mostly with good reason. <br />The process of coming to answers for those questions has not been easy or without its <br />conflicts. And worse, the City has been bound by the strictures of the legal process and <br />unable to respond to any and every allegation leveled at it. That problem has been <br />compounded by questionable, and sometimes downright irresponsible, reporting. <br />Difficult situations are only made worse in such cases. <br /> <br />The most recent media coverage expects us to believe that a Park and Recreation <br />Commission member is able to run willy-nilly through City Finances spending what and <br />where he may choose and lining his own pockets at the city expense and then become <br />Mayor. If anyone believes this to actually be possible, the City has far greater problems <br />than we have delved into thus far. Regardless of position, no ONE person is able to <br />expend city resources without the assistance or negligence of at least several other <br />individuals. <br /> <br />The problem of acquiring city equipment through the proper channels is something that <br />needs to be addressed, and IS under the proper scrutiny. Situations such as this will no <br />longer be able to exist if we would have followed the procedures already set in place. <br />However, for anyone to attempt to crucify the current Mayor for processes beyond his <br />knowledge and authority – both then and now – is the height of irresponsibility. The City <br />doesn’t need a scapegoat, we need the truth and ethical standards. Even this problem <br />is being handled in the manner set forth in city charter and will be solved by the <br />combined efforts of the staff and Council. The business of the city goes far beyond this <br />one area of correction and that business must continue. <br /> <br />The city staff, Mayor and Council have gone to significant effort to address each <br />problem they, and others, have brought forward. Vague and flawed policies and <br />procedures have been set aside or rewritten to assure that every decision can be <br />documented and supported. Of course, difficult problems make for difficult <br />conversations. The City Council debates are becoming notorious for their length, <br />frequency and occasional squabbles in an effort to hear everyone’s opinion and develop <br />workable solutions. There is no foreseeable end to those conversations as the duty of <br />the Council is to discuss and compromise to ensure that no single person EVER has the <br />ability to make decisions unilaterally. Those five voices do become one with the act of a <br />vote. At that moment, the Council stands united whether or not the members held <br />opposing views beforehand. The City Council will continue to do so. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.