Laserfiche WebLink
Item No: 4 <br />Meeting Date: April 1, 2002 <br />Type of Business: Worksession City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Discuss Future of City’s Rental Properties <br />Date of Report: March 27, 2002 <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City owns two single-family residential properties which were purchased with the <br />intent to foster redevelopment. Both properties, 7861 Groveland Road and 3016 County <br />Road H2, are currently leased on a month-to-month basis. The monthly rent for the <br />Groveland Road property is $975; for the County Road H2 property, the monthly rent is <br />$825. Unfortunately, collection of the rent and the oversight has proven to be an <br />administrative headache. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />With more than a year of experience in maintaining the rental properties, staff thought it <br />would be a good idea to reevaluate the City’s options and to make a determination <br />whether to continue renting the properties on a month-to-month basis or to explore other <br />alternatives for the property. <br /> <br />In a perfect world, renting the properties while the City awaits redevelopment offers is a <br />great idea. Collectively, the City would take in $21,600 annually, which is a pretty good <br />return on the investment. However, at least 20% of that amount is spent on repairs, <br />maintenance and property taxes, which results in a net of about $17,000; still a <br />substantial annual return for properties being held for future redevelopment. <br />Unfortunately, a percentage of the rent proceeds are also used to offset the staff time <br />and administration of the homes, and I would argue that once the staff and administrative <br />component is figured in, the annual return is minimized to the point of asking the <br />question, “Is it worth it?” <br /> <br />Both tenants have been habitually late in paying their rents, often going more than one <br />month before getting caught up from previous months back-rent. (Rent for each month is <br />considered “late” if not received by the tenth day of that month.) The expectation has <br />regrettably shifted so that we now expect the rent to be late. This shift in expectation <br />caused an oversight on the City’s part, whereas the tenant at 7861 Groveland has fallen <br />several months behind in his rent. Multiple letters were sent without response until the <br />tenant finally made contact with staff in February, apologizing for his situation yet desiring to <br />work out a repayment schedule. We consented to a repayment agreement on the condition <br />that the March rent would be paid in full on or before its due date or we would proceed with <br />eviction. Unfortunately, the due date came and went, and we have received no payments <br />from the tenant. Kennedy & Graven were subsequently asked to draft the eviction <br />paperwork and begin the process of collecting what the City is owed in back rent. <br />In the case of 3016 County Road H2, the tenant is currently behind by $100 plus the $25 <br />late fee. We have also been notified that the tenant is behind on her utilities to the point