Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kevin Carroll <br /> 410 January 22, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The Mermaid was originally purchased by a business controlled by Charles Hall more than twenty <br /> (20) years ago. The original business was owned and operated by the Mermaid Cocktail Lounge, <br /> Inc., a corporation which is now known as "Moundsvista, Inc." That corporation is controlled <br /> by Charles Hall who owns a majority of the issued and outstanding stock of that corporation. <br /> The remaining minority interests in the corporation are owned by the children of Charles Hall. <br /> In the late 1980s operation of the Mermaid was assumed by the Mermaid, Inc., a corporation <br /> which is owned by the.children of Charles Hall and has been led by Daniel L. Hall as its <br /> President. The Mermaid, Inc. leases the land, improvements and fixtures from Moundsvista. <br /> Both Moundsvista and the Mermaid have attempted to run their business in a fiscally conservative <br /> manner and have worked hard to keep debt at low levels to reduce operating costs and to allow <br /> them to continue to improve the Mermaid complex. <br /> DEVELOPER <br /> . The Developer of the hotel and banquet center is owned and controlled by Charles and Daniel <br /> Hall. In order to further the financing of the project and to provide for an integrated management <br /> and ownership of the entire Mermaid Complex, it is proposed that the Developer acquire existing . <br /> real estate and improvements of Moundsvista, Inc. and the additional sites owned by unrelated <br /> parties that will be necessary to accommodate the proposed Project. <br /> TRANSACTION <br /> In order to facilitate the Project and financing, it is proposed that the Developer acquire the <br /> existing real estate and improvements of Moundsvista together with several adjacent tracts. The <br /> Developer has not yet-reached-an agreementwithadjacent-property owners as-to-the acquisition ; <br /> cost. Under any analysis, the costs of acquiring the adjacent properties will be substantial. The <br /> financial materials and projected project costs already submitted to the City included allocations <br /> of land cost to the hotel component of the Project, as well as the banquet component of the <br /> Project. These projections represented earlier conceptual project designs that would have <br /> provided for separate tracts for each of the hotel, banquet center and the existing Mermaid <br /> complex to facilitate separate ownership and operation. Under the current proposal, the hotel,. <br /> banquet center and existing Mermaid complex are to be operated as one integral unit located on <br /> one site with common ownership and management. Accordingly, the land costs are no longer <br /> being allocated to each of the specific components of the Project. The allocation of land costs <br /> on the earlier projection were an effort to demonstrate the level of commitment of the Developer <br /> • to the City. In fact, under the current proposal, the commitment of my client is greater. In other <br /> words, the entire interest in the Mermaid complex together with the adjacent properties that will <br />