Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br /> Chapter 6: Administration of City Affairs. <br /> This chapter will be the hardest for me to evaluate from a non-bias <br /> position. At least it will be preceded as a bias position. I have both <br /> philosophical and practical problems with this entire section. It should be <br /> remembered that the City Council has only limited time available to impact <br /> on the daily operation of the community. For that reason, the City Councils. <br /> throughout the state,which has significent populations, have hired and rely <br /> on City employees and staff to conduct the daily business. This is true re- <br /> gardless of the form of government that the City may have. Therefore, the <br /> Councils must have faith in the ability of their employees to conduct and excute <br /> the policies , ordinances which they established at the legislative body for the <br /> community. Thus, the comments made on this chapter will be tempered by pro- <br /> fessional convictions by understanding of the statutes and my previous pro- <br /> fessional experiences in the municipal field within the state of Minnesota. <br /> I would hope that the Commission will accept these comments in the manner form <br /> in which they are given. My purpose in this profession and in this community <br /> is the same as the City Council and hopefully the same as the Commission, that <br /> of providing effective,responsive government for the residents of this City. <br /> Before commencing on the section by section review I would again like to <br /> emphasize that the Charter Commission should strongly consider and amend this <br /> chapter to the Council-Manager form of government. The City Council has not <br /> reduced its authority by adopting this form of government. For example, in <br /> the City of St. Louis Park Charter under their section 2.01 "All discretionary <br /> powers of the City, both legislative and executive, shall be vested in and be <br /> excercised by the City Council". Similar language can be drafted in to the <br /> Mounds View City Charter. <br /> The Commission should remember that the two major differences between the <br /> Plan A and Plan B form of government is that the City Manager has the ability <br /> to hire and fire and that it is manditory that he prepare the budget for Council <br /> adoption. This is not significently different then what existed in this Com- <br /> munity now. The City's Administrator is preparing budget for the City Council <br /> to adopt and the recommendation for hiring and firing of employees will still <br /> come from that position. Again, referring to the St. Louis Park Charter under <br /> section 5.02 duties and powers of the City Manager, sub. B, "To point with the <br /> consent and approval of the Council all Department Heads and subordinate Officers <br /> set forth in City Charter; and" . So even here the City Council has the final <br /> say on the hiring and firing of an employee. <br /> Included at the end of the discussion of the chapter is the City Management <br /> Code of ethics which are the professional standards by which I conduct myself. <br /> A copy of a resolution which the City of Minnetrista adopted ,while I was the <br /> Administrator of that Community. <br /> Section 6.01 : This section should be rewritten to state that the City Council is <br /> the head of legislative branch of the City government, and the Administrator is <br /> the head of the administration of the City. Some additional language maybe added <br /> that the Administrator should be hired solely on the basis of his or her qualifi- <br /> cations . <br />